Women's views of the place of confinement

被引:0
|
作者
Fordham, S
机构
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 1997年 / 47卷 / 415期
关键词
home confinement; patient choice; maternity care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The proportion of births taking place in the home of the mother has declined to less than 1% of the total, in spite of the lack of evidence of the benefits of hospitalization. Home confinement remains rare when supported by general practitioners; little is known of the preferences of women of childbearing age. Aims. To examine the beliefs of women of childbearing age concerning the advantages and disadvantages of giving birth in hospital or their own homes, the choices of place of birth open to them, and the information required to enable an informed choice. Method. A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to a sample of 340 women aged 20-40 years who were registered with the study practice -- a single-handed urban general practice that supports home confinement. Results. Completed questionnaires were received from 68% (241) of subjects. Parity of respondents ranged from zero (24%) to five. Altogether, 76% (159) of the respondents had previously had children. A total of 97% (154) of the parous respondents had prior experience only of delivery in hospital. In all, 86% (198) of the respondents expressed a preference for hospital delivery for any future children, with 3.5% (8) preferring home and 10.5% (24) undecided. Preference for home birth was associated with multiparity and indecision with nulliparity (Kruskal-Wallis, P=0.040). Most women believed that giving birth in hospital was safer than at home. Most women had little knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of giving birth at home and in hospital, although there was substantial demand for further information, and a minority who were better informed than their peers. A minority of respondents spontaneously expressed hostility to all home confinements. Conclusions. Women show a wide spectrum of opinion on this subject. Further information is needed for women to make a free and informed choice of place of birth; providing this in an acceptable form is likely to require knowledge of the individuals concerned.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Democrats/republicans and the Politics of Women's Place
    Graber, DA
    POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 118 (03) : 523 - 524
  • [32] Place Effects on Environmental Views
    Hamilton, Lawrence C.
    Colocousis, Chris R.
    Duncan, Cynthia M.
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) : 326 - 347
  • [33] Women's place: female representations in the 1930's in the newspaper
    Ribeiro dos Santos Schneider, Luana Priscila
    Schemes, Claudia
    ESTUDIOS HISTORICOS, 2021, (26):
  • [34] SPACES OF WOMEN'S CINEMA Space, place and genre in contemporary women's filmmaking
    West-Knights, Imogen
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2019, (6069): : 31 - 31
  • [35] THE PLACE OF CONFINEMENT - A QUESTION OF STATISTICS OR ETHICS
    ZANDER, LI
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1981, 7 (03) : 125 - 127
  • [36] Women's views on the practice of prenatal perineal massage
    Labrecque, M
    Eason, E
    Marcoux, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (05): : 499 - 504
  • [37] Presidential Perspectives: Women's Views From the Top
    Roessler, Genevieve
    McBurney, Ruth
    Pryor, Kathryn H.
    Hamrick, Barbara
    Kirner, Nancy P.
    Martinez, Nicole E.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2018, 115 (05): : 608 - 615
  • [38] Women's Views on Elective Primary Caesarean Section
    Pakenham, Susan
    Chamberlain, Susan M.
    Smith, Graeme N.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2006, 28 (12) : 1089 - 1094
  • [39] Women's views of birth after cesarean section
    Sys, Dorota
    Kajdy, Anna
    Baranowska, Barbara
    Tataj-Puzyna, Urszula
    Gotlib, Joanna
    Baczek, Grazyna
    Rabijewski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (12) : 4270 - 4279
  • [40] A qualitative study of women's views on medical confidentiality
    Jenkins, G
    Merz, JF
    Sankar, P
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (09) : 499 - 504