BrucellaCapt versus Classical Tests in the Serological Diagnosis and Management of Human Brucellosis

被引:32
|
作者
Casanova, Aurora [1 ]
Ariza, Javier [2 ]
Rubio, Manuel [4 ]
Masuet, Cristina [3 ]
Diaz, Ramon [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Dept Microbiol, IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Dept Infect Dis, IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Dept Prevent Med, IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Microbiol, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
HEPATOSPLENIC SUPPURATIVE BRUCELLOSIS; NEGATIVE CONVENTIONAL SEROLOGY; AGGLUTINATION TESTS; COOMBS-TEST; PCR ASSAY; ANTIBODIES; BACTEREMIA; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.1128/CVI.00348-08
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The BrucellaCapt test is an immunocapture agglutination test suggested as a possible substitute for the Coombs test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Here it is compared with classical tests using 321 samples from 48 patients with brucellosis (6.9 +/- 1.7 samples per patient), including 20 patients with focal disease and 8 patients with a total of 9 relapse episodes (mean follow-up, 18 months). The BrucellaCapt test was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and we also used a variant of the BrucellaCapt test in which the microtiter plates were not coated with antibodies against total human immunoglobulin (BCAPV). The correlation between the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests was 0.982 (P < 0.001), with 260 coincident pairs of titers (81%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests with respect to the Coombs test were 0.969 and 0.960, respectively. Upon admission, the BrucellaCapt, BCAPV, and Coombs tests and the microagglutination test (MAT) were positive for all cases: titers were 1/2,560 by the BrucellaCapt test, 1/2,560 by the BCAPV test, 1/1,280 by the Coombs test, and 1/320 by the MAT. The decreases in the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV titers over time were pronounced in comparison with the Coombs titers. Cumulative probabilities of persistence 12 months after therapy were as follows: 80% by the BrucellaCapt test, 80% by the BCAPV test, 87% by the Coombs test, and 35% by the MAT. Serological changes during relapse were detected in seven cases (88%) by the Coombs test, in five cases by the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests, and in three cases by the MAT. The BrucellaCapt test is a sensitive, specific, and simple test for routine use in human brucellosis. Similar results were obtained with the BCAPV test. However, in some cases of relapse and chronic forms of the disease, the slight changes observed in low-affinity antibodies alone are better detected by the Coombs test.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 851
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The value of culture and serological methods in the diagnosis of human brucellosis
    Aliskan, Hikmet
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2008, 42 (01): : 185 - 195
  • [32] Evaluation of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis in French Polynesia
    Anne Praud
    Olivier Gimenez
    Gina Zanella
    Nathalie Pozzi
    Valérie Antras
    Laurence Meyer
    Bruno Garin-Bastuji
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2013, 45 : 931 - 933
  • [33] Value of different serological tests in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the Amazonian region
    Molnar, B
    Molnar, L
    Vale, WG
    ACTA VETERINARIA HUNGARICA, 1998, 46 (02) : 199 - 210
  • [34] Evaluation of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis in French Polynesia
    Praud, Anne
    Gimenez, Olivier
    Zanella, Gina
    Pozzi, Nathalie
    Antras, Valerie
    Meyer, Laurence
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 (04) : 931 - 933
  • [35] Evaluation of tests employed in serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella ovis
    Cerri, D
    Ebani, VV
    Pedrini, A
    Bassi, S
    Bey, RF
    Andreani, E
    Farina, R
    MICROBIOLOGICA, 2000, 23 (03): : 281 - 288
  • [36] Bayesian evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh
    Rahman, A. K. M. A.
    Smit, S.
    Devleesschauwer, B.
    Kostoulas, P.
    Abatih, E.
    Saegerman, C.
    Shamsuddin, M.
    Berkvens, D.
    Dhand, N. K.
    Ward, M. P.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 147
  • [37] Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis
    Praud, Anne
    Gimenez, Olivier
    Zanella, Gina
    Dufour, Barbara
    Pozzi, Nathalie
    Antras, Valerie
    Meyer, Laurence
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 104 (1-2) : 94 - 100
  • [38] Follow-up Brucellacapt and Rose Bengal Tests in 110 Children with Brucellosis
    Ocal Demir, Sevliya
    Bacalan, Fatma
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 16 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [39] Evaluation and comparison of fluorescence polarization assay with three of the currently used serological tests in diagnosis of human brucellosis
    Konstantinidis, A.
    Minas, A.
    Pournaras, S.
    Kansouzidou, A.
    Papastergiou, P.
    Maniatis, A.
    Stathakis, N.
    Hadjichristodoulou, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 26 (10) : 715 - 721
  • [40] Utility of Serological Tests in the Era of Molecular Testing for Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis in Endemic Area with Limited Resources
    Purwar, Shashank
    Metgud, Sharada C.
    Mutnal, Manohar B.
    Nagamoti, Mahantesh B.
    Patilpatients, Chidanand S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (02) : DC26 - DC29