Comparison of Statistical Signal Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms for Spectrum Sensing

被引:0
|
作者
Tiwari, Ayush [1 ]
Chenji, Harsha [2 ]
Devabhaktuni, Vijay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In a cognitive radio network, what is the trade off between statistical signal processing and machine learning algorithms that perform the same task? When should a system use the former and when should it use the latter? In this paper we present an empirical comparison study of different techniques for two tasks: detecting multiple transmitters in the same time-frequency domain, and automatic modulation classification. We develop and improve upon an unsupervised learning technique for the former, based on the log-Rayleigh distribution. Results are based on data generated from GNU Radio Companion, and implementations of these algorithms in software. They show that there is a tradeoff between accuracy and computation/implementation complexity signal processing has a several orders of magnitude advantage over machine learning, but slightly lower accuracy. Thus, there is a need for an overarching framework that can meld machine learning and statistical signal processing.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A comparison of machine learning algorithms for the surveillance of autism spectrum disorder
    Lee, Scott H.
    Maenner, Matthew J.
    Heilig, Charles M.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [12] Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
    Sun, Ying
    Babu, Prabhu
    Palomar, Daniel P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 65 (03) : 794 - 816
  • [13] Heart sound classification using signal processing and machine learning algorithms
    Zeinali, Yasser
    Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan
    MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 7
  • [14] Hydrogel and Machine Learning for Soft Robots’ Sensing and Signal Processing: A Review
    Shuyu Wang
    Zhaojia Sun
    Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2023, 20 : 845 - 857
  • [15] Hydrogel and Machine Learning for Soft Robots' Sensing and Signal Processing: A Review
    Wang, Shuyu
    Sun, Zhaojia
    JOURNAL OF BIONIC ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (03) : 845 - 857
  • [16] NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING REGRESSION ALGORITHMS
    Trawinski, Bogdan
    Smetek, Magdalena
    Telec, Zbigniew
    Lasota, Tadeusz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2012, 22 (04) : 867 - 881
  • [17] Adaptive machine learning algorithm employed statistical signal processing for classification of ECG signal and myoelectric signal
    Jeyaraj, Pandia Rajan
    Nadar, Edward Rajan Samuel
    MULTIDIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, 31 (04) : 1299 - 1316
  • [18] Machine Learning for Signal Processing
    Van Hulle, Marc M.
    Larsen, Jan
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2008, 72 (1-3) : 1 - 2
  • [19] Adaptive machine learning algorithm employed statistical signal processing for classification of ECG signal and myoelectric signal
    Pandia Rajan Jeyaraj
    Edward Rajan Samuel Nadar
    Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 31 : 1299 - 1316
  • [20] Comparison of Four Recovery Algorithms used in Compressed Sensing for ECG Signal Processing
    Zhang, Zhimin
    Wei, Shoushui
    Wei, Dingwen
    Li, Liping
    Liu, Feng
    Liu, Chengyu
    2016 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY CONFERENCE (CINC), VOL 43, 2016, 43 : 401 - 404