Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques

被引:54
|
作者
Barrilleaux, PS [1 ]
Bofill, JA
Terrone, DA
Magann, EF
May, WL
Morrison, JC
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
misoprostol; cervical ripening; induction; Foley catheter;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.123821
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different techniques of cervical ripening and induction. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who required cervical ripening and induction were randomized to one of 3 groups: (1) supracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal dinoprostone gel, (2) supracervical Foley catheter and 100 mug oral doses of misoprostol, or (3) serial 100-mug oral doses of misoprostol. Intravenous oxytocin was administered when a protraction disorder of labor was identified. RESULTS: There were 339 women randomized. There was no significant difference in the time from first intervention to delivery in the 3 groups (P=.546). In each group, a similar percentage of women required oxytocin (P=.103). The rates of cesarean delivery were equivalent among the groups (P=.722). Rates of tachysystole were high but statistically equivalent among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences in Apgar scores or umbilical artery pH. CONCLUSION: Oral 100 mug serial doses of misoprostol, with or without the use of a supracervical Foley catheter, were equivalent to the use of a supracervical Foley catheter and serial 4-mg doses of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1129
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of Labor in Preeclamptic Women in India: A Randomized Trial Comparing Foley Catheter With Oral Misoprostol
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Bracken, Hillary
    Faragher, Brian
    Easterling, Thomas
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Weeks, Andrew
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 75S - 75S
  • [42] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [43] Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Lanka, Sreelakshmi
    Surapaneni, Tarakeswari
    Nirmalan, Praveen K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (06) : 1527 - 1533
  • [44] A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Wing, DA
    OrtizOmphroy, G
    Paul, RH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (03) : 612 - 618
  • [45] Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study
    Garg, Rahul
    Bagga, Rashmi
    Kumari, Aruna
    Kalra, Jasvinder
    Jain, Vanita
    Saha, Subhas Chandra
    Kumar, Praveen
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [46] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [47] Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review
    Greenberg, Victoria
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 441 - 443
  • [48] USE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER AS A CERVICAL RIPENING AGENT PRIOR TO INDUCTION OF LABOR
    JAMES, C
    PEEDICAYIL, A
    SESHADRI, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 47 (03) : 229 - 232
  • [49] Predictors of cesarean delivery in cervical ripening and labor induction with Foley catheter
    Marciniak, Beata
    Patro-Malysza, Jolanta
    Kimber-Trojnar, Zaneta
    Oleszczuk, Jan
    Leszczynska-Gorzelak, Bozena
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [50] Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Bebbington, M
    Schmuel, E
    Pevzner, L
    Bernstein, P
    Dayal, A
    Barnhard, J
    Chazotte, C
    Merkatz, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S211 - S211