Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference

被引:334
|
作者
Tilson, Julie K. [1 ]
Sullivan, Katherine J. [2 ]
Cen, Steven Y. [1 ]
Rose, Dorian K. [3 ]
Koradia, Cherisha H.
Azen, Stanley P. [4 ]
Duncan, Pamela W. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Div Biokinesiol & Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Phys Therapy Program, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Phys Therapy, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Div Biostat, Dept Prevent Med, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Community & Family Med, Div Doctor Phys Therapy, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2010年 / 90卷 / 02期
关键词
MODIFIED-RANKIN-SCALE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; BARTHEL INDEX; HEALTH-STATUS; DISABILITY MEASURES; TIME-COURSE; STROKE; RELIABILITY; REHABILITATION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20090079
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. When people with stroke recover gait speed, they report improved function and reduced disability. However, the minimal amount of change in gait speed that is clinically meaningful and associated with an important difference in function for people poststroke has not been determined. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for comfortable gait speed (CGS) associated with an improvement in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score for people between 20 to 60 days poststroke. Design. This was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. Methods. The participants in this Study were 283 people with first-time stroke prospectively enrolled in the ongoing Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) multi-site randomized clinical trial. Comfortable gait speed was measured and mRS scores were obtained at 20 and 60 days poststroke. improvement of >= 1 on the mRS was used to detect meaningful change in disability level. Results. Mean (SD) CGS was 0.18 (0.16) m/s at 20 days and 0.39 (0.22) m/s at 60 days poststroke. Among all participants, 47.3% experienced an improvement in disability level >= 1. The MCID was estimated as an improvement in CGS of 0.16 m/s anchored to the mRS. Limitations. Because the mRS is not a gait-specific measure of disability, the estimated MCID for CGS was only 73.9% sensitive and 57.0% specific for detecting improvement in mRS scores. Conclusions. We estimate that the MCID for gait speed among patients with Subacute stroke and severe gait speed impairments is 0.16 m/s. Patients with subacute stroke who increase gait speed >= 0.16 m/s are more likely to experience a meaningful improvement in disability level than those who do not. Clinicians can use this reference value to develop goals and interpret progress in patients with subacute stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Subaxial Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease Patients: Minimum Clinically Important Difference as a Tool for Determining Meaningful Clinical Improvement
    Auffinger, Brenda
    Lam, Sandi
    Shen, Jingjing
    Roitberg, Ben Z.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 74 (02) : 206 - 214
  • [32] Risk factors for not reaching minimal clinically important difference at 90 days and 1 year after elective lumbar spine surgery: a cohort study
    Hamilton, Travis
    Lim, Seokchun
    Telemi, Edvin
    Yun, Ho Jun
    Macki, Mohamed
    Schultz, Lonni
    Yeh, Hsueh-Han
    Springer, Kylie
    Taliaferro, Kevin
    Perez-Cruet, Miguelangelo
    Aleem, Ilyas
    Park, Paul
    Easton, Richard
    Nerenz, David R.
    Schwalb, Jason M.
    Abdulhak, Muwaffak
    Chang, Victor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024, 40 (03) : 343 - 350
  • [33] Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study
    Hayashi, Shota
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Takeda, Ren
    Iizuka, Takamitsu
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    Usuda, Shigeru
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (11) : 1512 - 1523
  • [34] Minimal clinically important difference for improvement in six-minute walk test in persons with knee osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty
    King, Lauren K.
    Hawker, Gillian A.
    Stanaitis, Ian
    Woodhouse, Linda
    Jones, C. Allyson
    Waugh, Esther J.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [35] Minimal clinically important difference for improvement in six-minute walk test in persons with knee osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty
    Lauren K. King
    Gillian A. Hawker
    Ian Stanaitis
    Linda Woodhouse
    C. Allyson Jones
    Esther J. Waugh
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [36] Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Correction of Sports-Related Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Percentage of Possible Improvement
    Carton, Patrick
    Filan, David
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [37] The minimal clinically important difference for COPD health status tools measured with global ratings of change during different time periods
    Alma, Harma
    de Jong, Corina
    Jelusic, Danijel
    Wittmann, Michael
    Schuler, Michael
    Kocks, Janwillem
    Schultz, Konrad
    van der Molen, Thys
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48
  • [38] The quality in reporting of studies determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of a patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and a first proposal of guidelines
    Vanier, Antoine
    Sebille, Veronique
    Rouquette, Alexandra
    Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S161 - S161
  • [39] What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III
    Coralo, Viviana
    Torre, Monica
    Ferrara, Giovanna
    Guerra, Federica
    Nicosia, Gabriella
    Romanelli, Ersilia
    Lopopolo, Angela
    Onesta, Maria P.
    Fiore, Pietro
    Falcone, Roberta
    Bonavita, Jacopo
    Molinari, Marco
    Scivoletto, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (04) : 508 - 515
  • [40] Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    O'Keefe, Daniel S.
    Saengchote, Supreeya A.
    Turnbull, Lacie M.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Struk, Aimee M.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    King, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (03) : 593 - 603