Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging

被引:194
|
作者
Plevritis, Sylvia K. [1 ]
Kurian, Allison W.
Sigal, Bronislava M.
Daniel, Bruce L.
Ikeda, Debra M.
Stockdale, Frank E.
Garber, Alan M.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Primary Care & Outcomes Res, Div Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.295.20.2374
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Women with inherited BRCA1/2 mutations are at high risk for breast cancer, which mammography often misses. Screening with contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects cancer earlier but increases costs and results in more false-positive scans. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with mammography plus breast MRI compared with mammography alone. Design, Setting, and Patients A computer model that simulates the life histories of individual BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, incorporating the effects of mammographic and MRI screening was used. The accuracy of mammography and breast MRI was estimated from published data in high-risk women. Breast cancer survival in the absence of screening was based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database of breast cancer patients diagnosed in the prescreening period (1975-1981), adjusted for the current use of adjuvant therapy. Utilization rates and costs of diagnostic and treatment interventions were based on a combination of published literature and Medicare payments for 2005. Main Outcome Measures The survival benefit, incremental costs, and cost-effectiveness of MRI screening strategies, which varied by ages of starting and stopping MRI screening, were computed separately for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Results Screening strategies that incorporate annual MRI as well as annual mammography have a cost per quality-adjusted life-year ( QALY) gained ranging from less than $45 000 to more than $700 000, depending on the ages selected for MRI screening and the specific BRCA mutation. Relative to screening with mammography alone, the cost per QALY gained by adding MRI from ages 35 to 54 years is $55 420 for BRCA1 mutation carriers, $130 695 for BRCA2 mutation carriers, and $98 454 for BRCA2 mutation carriers who have mammographically dense breasts. Conclusions Breast MRI screening is more cost-effective for BRCA1 than BRCA2 mutation carriers. The cost-effectiveness of adding MRI tomammography varies greatly by age.
引用
收藏
页码:2374 / 2384
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast Cancer Mortality among Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography Screening Program
    Warner, Ellen
    Zhu, Siqi
    Plewes, Donald B.
    Hill, Kimberley
    Ramsay, Elizabeth A.
    Causer, Petrina A.
    Seely, Jean
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Lenkov, Pamela
    Elser, Christine
    Crystal, Pavel
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Giannakeas, Vasily
    Sun, Ping
    Narod, Steven A.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 12
  • [22] Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Phi, Xuan-Anh
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Obdeijn, Inge-Marie
    Oosterwijk, Jan C.
    Feenstra, Talitha L.
    Houssami, Nehmat
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    BREAST, 2019, 45 : 82 - 88
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers.
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Nakagawa, Chizuko
    Kobayashi, Makoto
    Kobayashi, Yusuke
    Mano, Toshiki
    Nakamura, Seigo
    Arai, Masami
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [24] Screening and clinical implications for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Plon, SE
    JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 1998, 3 (04) : 377 - 387
  • [25] Screening and Clinical Implications for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
    Sharon E. Plon
    Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 1998, 3 : 377 - 387
  • [26] Management of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers
    Eeles, RA
    Camplejohn, R
    Peacock, J
    McMillan, T
    DISEASE MARKERS, 1999, 15 (1-3) : 204 - 204
  • [27] AURKA and breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers
    Bodvarsdottir, Sigridur K.
    Vidarsdottir, Linda
    Eyfjord, Jorunn E.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (11) : 2517 - 2517
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1/2 mutation profiling to target olaparib use in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Saito, Shota
    Nakazawa, Kyoko
    Nagahashi, Masayuki
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Akazawa, Kouhei
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (06) : 439 - 448
  • [29] Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Metcalfe, K
    Lynch, HT
    Chadirian, P
    Tung, N
    Olivotto, V
    Warner, E
    Olopade, OI
    Eisen, A
    Weber, B
    McLennan, J
    Sun, P
    Foulkes, WD
    Narod, SA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) : 2328 - 2335
  • [30] Prognosis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer
    Rennert, G
    Bisland-Becktell, S
    Almog, R
    Zhang, S
    Rennert, HS
    Narod, S
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (02) : 221 - 221