Elastic deformation modulus for estimating convergence when tunnelling through squeezing ground

被引:15
|
作者
Vrakas, A. [1 ]
Dong, W. [1 ]
Anagnostou, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
GEOTECHNIQUE | 2018年 / 68卷 / 08期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
deformation; laboratory tests; plasticity; rocks/rock mechanics; stiffness; tunnels & tunnelling; ROCK MASS; ELASTOPLASTIC ANALYSIS; STRESS; OPENINGS; DILATANCY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1680/jgeot.17.P.008
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Squeezing in tunnelling is commonly assessed using the linearly elastic-perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model. Weak rocks and fault materials, however, exhibit confining stress-dependent and strain-hardening behaviour prior to failure; in other words, the higher the confining stress and the lower the shear strain the stiffer the rock behaviour. As the MC model assumes a strain- and stress-independent Young's modulus, the selection of an appropriate 'operational' value, E-MC, remains a major problem in tunnel studies using this model. Although E-MC has a significant effect on the deformation predictions (they are inversely proportional to this value under small strain theory), there is no widely accepted or well-validated approach to its selection. This paper shows, using the results of triaxial compression tests on weak rocks and fault materials from the Gotthard base tunnel and five other projects, and performing a theoretical analysis of the ground response to tunnel excavation, that E-MC can be taken as equal to the secant modulus E-50 (rather than equal to the unloading-reloading modulus) extrapolated from standard triaxial compression test results to the in situ stress level. This is particularly useful for practical purposes as it allows standard computational methods to be used with sufficient accuracy, rendering more refined models unnecessary, at least at the preliminary design stage.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 728
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Interpretation of Core Extrusion Measurements When Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    Cantieni, L.
    Anagnostou, G.
    Hug, R.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2011, 44 (06) : 641 - 670
  • [2] Interpretation of Core Extrusion Measurements When Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    L. Cantieni
    G. Anagnostou
    R. Hug
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 44 : 641 - 670
  • [3] Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    Leone, Thomas
    Nordas, Alexandros N.
    Anagnostou, Georgios
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2023, 57 (1) : 351 - 374
  • [4] Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    Thomas Leone
    Alexandros N. Nordas
    Georgios Anagnostou
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2024, 57 : 351 - 374
  • [5] The Interaction Between Shield, Ground and Tunnel Support in TBM Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    Ramoni, M.
    Anagnostou, G.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2011, 44 (01) : 37 - 61
  • [6] The Interaction Between Shield, Ground and Tunnel Support in TBM Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
    M. Ramoni
    G. Anagnostou
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 44 : 37 - 61
  • [7] Creep Versus Consolidation in Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground—Part A: Basic Time Effects
    Leone, Thomas
    Nordas, Alexandros N.
    Anagnostou, Georgios
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 57 (08): : 5519 - 5536
  • [8] Creep Versus Consolidation in Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground-Part A: Basic Time Effects
    Leone, Thomas
    Nordas, Alexandros N.
    Anagnostou, Georgios
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (08) : 5519 - 5536
  • [9] Creep Versus Consolidation in Tunnelling through Squeezing Ground-Part B: Transferability of Experience
    Nordas, Alexandros N.
    Leone, Thomas
    Anagnostou, Georgios
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (08) : 5537 - 5555
  • [10] Quantification of extrusion-induced excavation volume in shield tunnelling through squeezing cohesive-frictional ground
    Thomas, Pferdekamper
    Georgios, Anagnostou
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):