Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Koo, Taeryool [1 ]
Cheong, Kwang-Ho [1 ]
Kim, Kyubo [2 ]
Park, Hae Jin [3 ]
Park, Younghee [4 ]
Koh, Hyeon Kang [5 ]
Kim, Byoung Hyuck [6 ]
Kim, Eunji [7 ]
Kim, Kyung Su [8 ]
Choi, Jin Hwa [9 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Anyang, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Konkuk Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul Metropolitan Govt, Boramae Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Korea Inst Radiol & Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; BILE-DUCT CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; RESECTION; PATTERNS; SURGERY; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0273395
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proposal for the delineation of the clinical target volume in biliary tract cancer radiotherapy
    Socha, J.
    Michalak, M.
    Wolakiewicz, G.
    Kepka, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S334 - S335
  • [2] The dosimetric impact of target volume delineation variation for cervical cancer radiotherapy
    Eminowicz, Gemma
    Rompokos, Vasilis
    Stacey, Christopher
    McCormack, Mary
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (03) : 493 - 499
  • [3] INTEROBSERVER VARIATION OF CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION IN GASTRIC CANCER
    Jansen, Edwin P. M.
    Nijkamp, Jasper
    Gubanski, Michael
    Lind, Pehr A. R. M.
    Verheij, Marcel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (04): : 1166 - 1170
  • [4] Clinical target volume delineation for radiotherapy of the esophagus
    Lazarescu, I.
    Thureau, S.
    Nkhali, L.
    Pradier, O.
    Dubray, B.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2013, 17 (5-6): : 453 - 460
  • [5] Variability of clinical target volume delineation for definitive radiotherapy in cervix cancer
    Eminowicz, Gemma
    McCormack, Mary
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (03) : 542 - 547
  • [6] Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands
    Nijkamp, Jasper
    de Haas-Kock, Danielle F. M.
    Beukema, Jannet C.
    Neelis, Karen J.
    Woutersen, Dankert
    Ceha, Heleen
    Rozema, Tom
    Slot, Annerie
    Vos-Westerman, Hanneke
    Intven, Martijn
    Spruit, Patty H.
    van der Linden, Yvette
    Geijsen, Debby
    Verschueren, Karijn
    van Herk, Marcel B.
    Marijnen, Corrie A. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 102 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [7] Automatic delineation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk by deep learning for rectal cancer postoperative radiotherapy q
    Song, Ying
    Hu, Junjie
    Wu, Qiang
    Xu, Feng
    Nie, Shihong
    Zhao, Yaqin
    Bai, Sen
    Yi, Zhang
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 145 : 186 - 192
  • [8] Radiotherapy for cervix carcinomas: Clinical target volume delineation
    Gnep, K.
    Mazeron, R.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2013, 17 (5-6): : 486 - 492
  • [9] Postoperative Radiotherapy for Glioma: Improved Delineation of the Clinical Target Volume Using the Geodesic Distance Calculation
    Yan, DanFang
    Yan, SenXiang
    Lu, ZhongJie
    Xie, Cong
    Chen, Wei
    Xu, Xing
    Li, Xinke
    Yu, Haogang
    Zhu, Xinli
    Zheng, LingYan
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment for Clinical Target Volume Delineation of the Postoperative Cavity in Breast Radiotherapy
    Lee, G.
    Fyles, A.
    Tran, P.
    Cho, J.
    Easson, A.
    Fenkell, L.
    Manchul, L.
    Wang, W.
    Dinniwell, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S211 - S211