Quantifying inhomogeneity of spatial point patterns

被引:7
|
作者
Schilcher, Udo [1 ,2 ]
Brandner, Guenther [2 ]
Bettstetter, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klagenfurt, Lakeside B02, A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Lakeside Labs GmbH, Lakeside B04, A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Wireless networks; Simulation; Modeling; Inhomogeneous spatial distribution; Inhomogeneity measure; RANDOM WAYPOINT; WIRELESS NETWORKS; HOMOGENEITY; CAPACITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2016.12.018
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article compares measures for quantifying the level of inhomogeneity of a given spatial point pattern. Comparisons are based on two main metrics: first, we evaluate the performance of the measures on both certain stochastic point processes and on very specific point patterns designed to expose potential weaknesses of the inhomogeneity measures. Second, we evaluate the computational complexity of the measures. Results" show that choosing a measure is a tradeoff between accurate assessment of inhomogeneity and computational complexity. The only exception is the proposed extended wrap-around measure, which is performing well in terms of both metrics. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring spatial inhomogeneity at different spatial scales using hybrids of Gibbs point process models
    Adina Iftimi
    Francisco Montes
    Jorge Mateu
    Carlos Ayyad
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2017, 31 : 1455 - 1469
  • [32] Measuring spatial inhomogeneity at different spatial scales using hybrids of Gibbs point process models
    Iftimi, Adina
    Montes, Francisco
    Mateu, Jorge
    Ayyad, Carlos
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 31 (06) : 1455 - 1469
  • [33] Spatial point pattern analysis of traces (SPPAT): An approach for visualizing and quantifying site-selectivity patterns of drilling predators
    Rojas, Alexis
    Dietl, Gregory P.
    Kowalewski, Michal
    Portell, Roger W.
    Hendy, Austin
    Blackburn, Jason K.
    PALEOBIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (02) : 259 - 271
  • [34] INHOMOGENEITY IN SPATIAL COX POINT PROCESSES - LOCATION DEPENDENT THINNING IS NOT THE ONLY OPTION
    Prokesova, Michaela
    IMAGE ANALYSIS & STEREOLOGY, 2010, 29 (03): : 133 - 141
  • [35] A systematic comparison of summary characteristics for quantifying point patterns in ecology
    Wiegand, Thorsten
    He, Fangliang
    Hubbell, Stephen P.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [36] Spectral tests of randomness for spatial point patterns
    Mugglestone, MA
    Renshaw, E
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2001, 8 (03) : 237 - 251
  • [37] Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns
    Baddeley, A
    Turner, R
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2000, 42 (03) : 283 - 315
  • [38] Validation of statistical models for spatial point patterns
    Baddeley, Adrian
    STATISTICAL CHALLENGES IN MODERN ASTRONOMY IV, 2007, 371 : 22 - 38
  • [39] Estimating geometric anisotropy in spatial point patterns
    Rajala, Tuomas A.
    Sarkka, Aila
    Redenbach, Claudia
    Sormani, Martina
    SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 : 100 - 114
  • [40] Analysis of spatial point patterns by kernel identification
    Vahidi-Asl, MQ
    Faghihi, MR
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 28 (A2): : 277 - 288