Adaptive and efficient mutual exclusion

被引:15
|
作者
Attiya, H [1 ]
Bortnikov, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
adaptive algorithms; remote step complexity; system response time; point contention; read/write operations;
D O I
10.1007/s004460100068
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This paper presents adaptive algorithms for mutual exclusion using only read and write operations; the performance of the algorithms depends only on the point contention, i.e., the number of processes that are concurrently active during the algorithm execution (and not on n, the total number of processes). Our algorithm has O(k) remote step complexity and 0 (log k) system response time, where k is the point contention. The remote step complexity is the maximal number of steps performed by a process where a wait is counted as one step. The system response time is the time interval between subsequent entries to the critical section, where one time unit is the minimal interval in which every active process performs at least one step. The space complexity of this algorithm is O(N log n), where N is the range of processes' names. We show how to make the space complexity of our algorithm depend solely on n, while preserving the other performance measures of the algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MUTUAL EXCLUSION
    DENNING, PJ
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 1991, 79 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [22] Mutual exclusion
    Schumny, H
    COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2001, 23 (04) : 249 - 251
  • [23] Domain Adaptive Object Detection Method Based on Feature Mutual Exclusion
    Runze, Li
    Zilei, Wang
    Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60 (10) : 198 - 208
  • [24] Adaptive Randomized Mutual Exclusion in Sub-Logarithmic Expected Time
    Hendler, Danny
    Woelfel, Philipp
    PODC 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2010, : 141 - 150
  • [25] Closing the Complexity Gap between FCFS Mutual Exclusion and Mutual Exclusion
    Danek, Robert
    Golab, Wojciech
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5218 : 93 - 108
  • [26] When does a correct mutual exclusion algorithm guarantee mutual exclusion?
    Lamport, L
    Perl, S
    Weihl, W
    INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 2000, 76 (03) : 131 - 134
  • [27] Closing the complexity gap between FCFS mutual exclusion and mutual exclusion
    Robert Danek
    Wojciech Golab
    Distributed Computing, 2010, 23 : 87 - 111
  • [28] Closing the Complexity Gap Between Mutual Exclusion and FCFS Mutual Exclusion
    Danek, Robert
    Golab, Wojciech
    PODC'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2008, : 448 - 448
  • [29] Efficient and Robust Local Mutual Exclusion in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
    Attiya, Hagit
    Kogan, Alex
    Welch, Jennifer L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2010, 9 (03) : 361 - 375
  • [30] An Efficient Mutual Exclusion Algorithm for Redundant Resources in Distributed Operating Systems
    Dantas Ramos, Marco Antonio
    de Araujo Macedo, Raimundo Jose
    Blagojevic, Anne
    2012 BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTING SYSTEM ENGINEERING (SBESC 2012), 2012, : 208 - 213