Feasibility of Virtual Reality Combined with Isocentric Navigation in Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy: A Cadaver Study

被引:12
|
作者
Zhou, Zhi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Shuo [1 ]
Zhao, Yong-zhao [1 ]
Zhu, Yan-jie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chuan-feng [1 ]
Gu, Xin [1 ]
Fan, Guo-xin [1 ,2 ]
He, Shi-sheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Orthopaed Dept, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Med, Spinal Pain Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Isocentric navigation; Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy; Virtual reality; LUMBAR DISKECTOMY; AUGMENTED REALITY; SURGERY; SIMULATORS; PUNCTURE; OUTCOMES; FUSION;
D O I
10.1111/os.12473
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (TPED) is one of the most commonly used minimally invasive spine surgeries around the world. However, conventional surgical planning and intraoperative procedures for TPED have relied on surgeons' experience, which limits its standardization and popularization. Virtual reality (VR) is a novel technology for pre-surgical planning in various fields of medicine, while isocentric navigation can guide intraoperative procedures for TPED. The present study aimed to explore the feasibility of applying VR combined with isocentric navigation in TPED on cadavers. Methods The surgical levels were L-3/L-4 and L-4/L-5 as well as L-5/S-1 of both sides of each cadaver specimen. First, the surgeon manually conducted the above procedures on the left side of every specimen without preoperative simulation and isocentric navigation (Group A). Then the same surgeon conducted the VR simulation for surgical planning of the right side (Group B). After VR simulation, the same surgeon made the percutaneous punctures and placed the working channel on the right side of the specimen at all levels. Results At the L-3/L-4 level, the puncture-channel time was 11.36 +/- 2.13 min in Group A and 11.29 +/- 2.23 min in Group B (t = 0.097, P = 0.938). The exposure time was 17.21 +/- 2.91 s in Group A and 14.64 +/- 1.60 s in Group B (t = 2.534, P = 0.025). At the L-4/L-5 level, the puncture-channel time was 13.86 +/- 3.90 min in Group A and 11.93 +/- 2.95 min in Group B (t = 2.291, P = 0.039). Exposure time was 20.64 +/- 3.84 s in Group A and 16.43 +/- 2.47 s in Group B (t = 6.118, P < 0.01). There were 7 patients undergoing foraminotomy in Group A and 3 patients undergoing foraminotomy in Group B (t = 2.280, P = 0.236). At the L-5/S-1 level, the puncture-channel time was 18.21 +/- 1.85 min in Group A and 15.71 +/- 3.20 min in Group B (t = 2.476, P = 0.028). Exposure time was 26.07 +/- 3.17 s in Group A and 22.50 +/- 2.68 s in Group B (t = 2.980, P = 0.011). There were 14 patients receiving foraminotomy in Group A and 13 patients receiving foraminotomy in Group B (t = 1.000, P = 1.000). Conclusions Virtual reality combined with isocentric navigation is feasible in TPED. It enables precise surgical planning and improves intraoperative procedures, and has the potential for application in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 499
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 3 Anesthetic Methods for Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: A Prospective Study
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Zhao, Yongzhao
    Fan, Guoxin
    Sun, Shiyu
    Zhou, Zhi
    Wang, Dongdong
    Fan, Yunshan
    He, Shisheng
    Gu, Guangfei
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2018, 21 (04) : E347 - E353
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with osteoporosis
    Gu, Xiaobin
    Zhu, Wenhui
    He, Haiyi
    Wang, Zili
    Ding, Shaolong
    Guo, Gaosheng
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2019, 65 (06): : 779 - 785
  • [23] Trajectory Planning and Guided Punctures with Isocentric Navigation in Posterolateral Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
    Fan, Guoxin
    Wang, Chuanfeng
    Gu, Xin
    Zhang, Hailong
    He, Shisheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 103 : 899 - +
  • [24] The role of transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations
    Gotecha, Sarang
    Ranade, Deepak
    Patil, Sujay Vikhe
    Chugh, Ashish
    Kotecha, Megha
    Sharma, Shrikant
    Punia, Prashant
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2016, 7 (04): : 217 - 223
  • [25] Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study
    Chen, Qiyong
    Zhang, Zhongmin
    Liu, Boling
    Liu, Shaoqiang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (02) : 599 - 607
  • [26] Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for different types of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study
    Li, Pengfei
    Yang, Fengkai
    Chen, Ying
    Song, Youxin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (10)
  • [27] Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Retrospective Study
    Sinkemani, Arjun
    Hong, Xin
    Gao, Zeng-Xin
    Zhuang, Su-Yang
    Jiang, Zan-Li
    Zhang, Shao-Dong
    Bao, Jun-Ping
    Zhu, Lei
    Zhang, Pei
    Xie, Xin-Hui
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Xiao-Tao
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (06) : 833 - 840
  • [28] Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration Discectomy to Treat Posterior Ring Apophyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Wang, Yao-bin
    Chen, Shu-lian
    Cao, Chen
    Zhang, Kai
    Liu, Li-min
    Gao, Yan-zheng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (04) : 1092 - 1099
  • [29] Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective comparative study
    Jing, Zhizhen
    Li, Lijun
    Song, Jiefu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04): : 3111 - 3119
  • [30] Augmented reality for endoscopic sinus surgery with surgical navigation: a cadaver study
    Citardi, Martin J.
    Agbetoba, Abib
    Bigcas, Jo-Lawrence
    Luong, Amber
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2016, 6 (05) : 523 - 528