Effect of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) parenteral nutrition on immune function and nutritional support after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Jixun [1 ]
Si, Xianke [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Yang, Jiahua [1 ]
Cao, Yijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Putuo Hosp, Dept Gen Minimally Invas Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Radical gastrectomy; PICC; nutritional support; immune function; METAANALYSIS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) parenteral nutrition support on immune function and nutritional support in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. 140 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were selected as participants and were divided into study group and the control group by random number table, with 70 cases in each group. Patients in the two groups underwent standard gastrectomy under general anesthesia by the same group of doctors. The study group received postoperative PICC catheter parenteral nutrition, and the control group received central venous catheter (CVC) nutrition support. Comparative study was done using t test and Chi-square test. The serum levels of ALB, TFN, PA, Hb, CD4(+), CD8(+), CD4(+)/CD8(+), IgA, IgG, IgM and CD3(+) in the two groups were observed before and after treatment, and the postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. After treatment, the levels of ALB, TFN, PA and Hb in the two groups were significantly increased (P<0.05). Levels of CD3(+), CD4(+), CD4(+)/CD8(+), IgA, IgG and IgM also amplified significantly after treatment in both the groups, while CD8(+) decreased significantly (P<0.05). What's more, the improvement degree of the study group was significantly greater than that of the control group (P<0.05). The time of drawing drainage tube, recovering intestinal function, getting off bed and the length of hospital stay in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group and control group were 8.6% (6/70 cases) and 11.4% (8/70 cases) respectively, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). PICC catheter parenteral nutrition support and improve the nutritional status of patients, it was proved a safe and effective nutritional support which improve the cellular immune function and accelerated the recovery of gastrointestinal function.
引用
收藏
页码:1441 / 1445
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of PET-CT prior to peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in lymphoma patients: A historical control study
    Peng, Yi
    Xu, Huiju
    Zheng, Liyuan
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 54 : 636 - 636
  • [22] Regarding the Response to "Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Use in Home Parenteral Nutrition: A 4-Year Follow-up Study"
    Christensen, Line Dahlstrom
    Rasmussen, Henrik Hojgaard
    Vinter-Jensen, Lars
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2015, 39 (07) : 761 - 762
  • [23] Impact of malnutrition and nutritional support after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer
    Kang, Min Kyu
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2024, 8 (04): : 534 - 552
  • [24] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Tang, Tian-tian
    Liu, Lei
    Li, Chun-xiao
    Li, Yun-tao
    Zhou, Tao
    Li, Hai-ping
    Wang, Jianxin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (09) : 2245 - 2249
  • [25] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Adriana Toro
    Elena Schembari
    Edoardo Mattone
    Isidoro Di Carlo
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1004 - 1005
  • [26] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Toro, Adriana
    Schembari, Elena
    Mattone, Edoardo
    Di Carlo, Isidoro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) : 1004 - 1005
  • [27] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Tian-tian Tang
    Lei Liu
    Chun-xiao Li
    Yun-tao Li
    Tao Zhou
    Hai-ping Li
    Jianxin Wang
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 2245 - 2249
  • [28] An analysis of 90-day emergency department visits after peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement for prosthetic joint infection
    Charalambous, Lefko T.
    Hinton, Zoe
    Kim, Billy, I
    Case, Ayden
    Brown, Meredith
    Jiranek, William
    Seidelman, Jessica
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    INFECTION CONTROL & HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (12) : 1853 - 1858
  • [29] APPLICATION OF AXILLARIES VEIN DETAINING TRANSFUSION PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER (PICC) TUBE IN ANESTHESIA STAGE AFTER OPERATION IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY
    Du, G. Q.
    Yan, R.
    Mi, F. L.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 117 : 11 - 11
  • [30] Picc (peripherally inserted central catheter) catheterization in acute myeloid leukemia: A single tertiary cancer centre experience from eastern India
    Dey, S.
    Basak, J.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    Adhikari, S.
    Bhattacharjee, C.
    Mukhopadhyay, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : 165 - 165