Methodological Practices in Research on Arts-Based Programs in International Development: A Systematic Review
被引:2
|
作者:
Ware, Vicki-Ann
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Deakin Univ, Fac Arts & Educ, Melbourne Burwood Campus,321 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Vic 3125, AustraliaDeakin Univ, Fac Arts & Educ, Melbourne Burwood Campus,321 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
Ware, Vicki-Ann
[1
]
Dunphy, Kim
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Melbourne, Creat Arts Therapy Res Unit, Victorian Coll Arts, 234 St Kilda Rd, Southbank 3006, AustraliaDeakin Univ, Fac Arts & Educ, Melbourne Burwood Campus,321 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
Dunphy, Kim
[2
]
机构:
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Arts & Educ, Melbourne Burwood Campus,321 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Creat Arts Therapy Res Unit, Victorian Coll Arts, 234 St Kilda Rd, Southbank 3006, Australia
International development;
Participatory arts;
Systematic review;
Research methods;
Arts-based international development;
THEATER;
COMMUNITY;
INTERVENTIONS;
DRAMA;
HIV/AIDS;
MUSIC;
SPORT;
YOUTH;
VIDEO;
POWER;
D O I:
10.1057/s41287-018-0164-1
中图分类号:
F0 [经济学];
F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
0201 ;
020105 ;
03 ;
0303 ;
摘要:
International development initiatives increasingly use programmes involving arts participation to facilitate desired outcomes, such as improved psychosocial wellbeing and conflict resolution. Research into the effectiveness of these interventions has increased commensurately. However, this research has not necessarily been of high quality. This article reports a systematic review of 67 studies of arts-based international development initiatives, to examine the research methods used and the quality of their application. Methodological strength and integrity were analysed against criteria important for research quality in this field, including use of participatory methods, clarity of research question, methodological rigour and system, supportable claims of causal links and supportable generalisations. The findings indicate that only one-third of studies employed robust methods. Challenges include inappropriate selection of research methods to match stated research questions, lack of adequate reporting of data to allow readers to assess the validity of claims, and overly strong claims made with insufficient support.