Elastography Complements Ultrasound as Principle Modality in Breast Lesion Assessment

被引:5
|
作者
Redling, Katharina [1 ]
Schwab, Fabienne [1 ]
Siebert, Matthias [1 ]
Schotzau, Andy [2 ]
Zanetti-Dallenbach, Rosanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Spitalstr 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Dept Stat, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Breast; Breast cancer; Breast disease; Ultrasound; BI-RADS; Elastography; Tsukuba score; Strain ratio; Breast lesions; Breast ultrasound; STRAIN RATIO; TUMOR SIZE; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1159/000445746
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The study aimed to improve breast cancer diagnosis with new ultrasound (US) modalities. We examined whether real-time elastography (RTE) complements the diagnostic performance of US. Methods: The Ethical Committee approved the study. Patients provided written informed consent and received a whole breast workup. Breast lesions were evaluated by US and RTE. Lesions were assessed by BIRADS, Tsukuba score (TS) and strain ratio (SR). Results: The study included 164 breast lesions of which 101 were benign and 63 malignant. Women with benign lesions were predominantly premenopausal with sonographic dense breast tissue. Women with breast cancer were mostly postmenopausal, with a low sonographic density. Benign lesions had a mean TS of 2.05, which was significantly lower than the mean TS of 3.25 for malignant lesions. The SR for benign lesions (SR 1.83) was significantly smaller than for breast cancer (SR 4.83). Sensitivity and specificity was 95 and 81% for BI-RADS, 39 and 94% for TS, and 57 and 83% for SR, with a cutoff at 2.5. The combination of BI-RADS, TS and SR yielded a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 85%. Conclusion: Besides morphologic features revealed by US, elastic properties of breast lesions obtained by RTE can be exploited for diagnostic breast imaging. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrasound elastography: compression elastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injury
    Prado-Costa, Rui
    Rebelo, Joao
    Monteiro-Barroso, Joao
    Preto, Ana Sofia
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2018, 9 (05): : 791 - 814
  • [32] Breast lesion classification based on supersonic shear-wave elastography and automated lesion segmentation from B-mode ultrasound images
    Yu, Yanyan
    Xiao, Yang
    Cheng, Jieyu
    Chiu, Bernard
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 93 : 31 - 46
  • [33] Shear strain estimation and lesion mobility assessment in elastography
    Konofagou, EE
    Harrigan, T
    Ophir, J
    ULTRASONICS, 2000, 38 (1-8) : 400 - 404
  • [34] A NOVEL ELASTOGRAPHY PHANTOM PROTOTYPE FOR ASSESSMENT OF ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY IMAGING PERFORMANCE
    Al-Mutairi, Fahad F.
    Chung, Emma Ml
    Moran, Carmel M.
    Ramnarine, Kumar, V
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 47 (09): : 2749 - 2758
  • [35] ASSESSMENT OF DIASTOLIC FUNCTION USING ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY
    Vejdani-Jahromi, Maryam
    Freedman, Jenna
    Kim, Young-Joong
    Trahey, Gregg E.
    Wolf, Patrick D.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (03): : 551 - 561
  • [36] Ultrasound Elastography for Hand Soft Tissue Assessment
    Giambini, Hugo
    An, Kai-Nan
    HAND CLINICS, 2022, 38 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [37] Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound
    Drukker, K
    Giger, ML
    Horsch, K
    Kupinski, MA
    Vyborny, CJ
    Mendelson, EB
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (07) : 1438 - 1446
  • [38] Automatic lesion detection on breast ultrasound
    Drukker, K
    Giger, M
    Horsch, K
    Kupinski, M
    Vyborny, C
    Mendelson, E
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) : 588 - 588
  • [39] Lesion Detectability in Automated Breast Ultrasound
    Bahramian, Sara
    Wear, Keith
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 9040
  • [40] Quantified ultrasound elastography in the assessment of cutaneous carcinoma
    Dasgeb, Bahar
    Morris, Michael A.
    Mehregan, Darius
    Siegel, Eliot L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1054):