Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards

被引:72
|
作者
Oz, Nurdan Ece [1 ,4 ]
Mete, Suleyman [2 ]
Serin, Faruk [3 ]
Gul, Muhammet [2 ]
机构
[1] TANAP Nat Gas Transmiss Co, Occupat Hlth & Safety Dept, Balikesir, Turkey
[2] Munzur Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Tunceli, Turkey
[3] Munzur Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Tunceli, Turkey
[4] Munzur Univ, Dept Engn Management, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Tunceli, Turkey
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2019年 / 25卷 / 06期
关键词
risk assessment; natural gas pipeline; 2D risk matrix; Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH; DECISION-MAKING; HYBRID METHOD; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION; EXTENSION; AHP;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2018.1495057
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A natural gas pipeline project is a broad construction system consisting of both offshore and onshore section, which aims to supply the natural gas to one country to another. In such these projects, main focus of the works should cover workplace, environment, health, and safety of workers and employers. To achieve this, a new occupational health and safety (OHS) risk assessment is necessary for reducing the negative effects of emerged risks. In this article, a fuzzy-based risk model is developed for prioritizing primary and residual risk. A two-dimensional (2D) risk matrix method is initially performed and the Pythagorean fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (PFTOPSIS) method is then used to prioritize previously identified hazards. For the prioritization of primary and residual risks, hazards are assessed against two parameters (probability and severity) of 2D risk matrix. Unlike previous risk assessment studies, PFTOPSIS is applied for the first time. The fuzzy model is applied to a case study for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project. A sensitivity analysis is also performed on parameter weights in order to validate the model.
引用
收藏
页码:1615 / 1632
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] AHP–TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis
    M. Fatih Ak
    Muhammet Gul
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2019, 5 : 113 - 126
  • [2] The risk assessment of landslide hazards in Shiwangmiao based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets-Topsis model
    X. B. Gu
    Y. Ma
    Q. H. Wu
    X. J. Ji
    H. Bai
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 111 : 283 - 303
  • [3] The risk assessment of landslide hazards in Shiwangmiao based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets-Topsis model
    Gu, X. B.
    Ma, Y.
    Wu, Q. H.
    Ji, X. J.
    Bai, H.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 111 (01) : 283 - 303
  • [4] AHP-TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis
    Ak, M. Fatih
    Gul, Muhammet
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 5 (02) : 113 - 126
  • [5] A decision-support system based on Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR for occupational risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline construction
    Mete, Suleyman
    Serin, Faruk
    Oz, Nurdan Ece
    Gul, Muhammet
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 71
  • [6] Risk assessment of liquefied natural gas carriers using fuzzy TOPSIS
    Elsayed, Tarek
    Marghany, Khaled
    Abdulkader, Said
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2014, 9 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [7] Fine-Kinney method based on fuzzy logic for natural gas pipeline project risk assessment
    Efe, Burak
    Efe, oemer Faruk
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (22) : 16465 - 16482
  • [8] Fine-Kinney method based on fuzzy logic for natural gas pipeline project risk assessment
    Burak Efe
    Ömer Faruk Efe
    Soft Computing, 2023, 27 : 16465 - 16482
  • [9] A Risk Assessment Model of Gas Pipeline Leakage Based on a Fuzzy Hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Tian, Jiangxue
    Lv, Shuran
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [10] Analytic Hierarchy Process on the gob natural gas pipeline risk assessment
    Wang, Jindong
    Shen, Haifeng
    Zhao, Zhenchao
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION II, 2014, 675-677 : 1371 - +