The Detrimental Effect of Poor Early Graft Function After Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy on Graft Outcomes

被引:46
|
作者
Nogueira, J. M. [1 ]
Haririan, A. [1 ]
Jacobs, S. C. [2 ]
Weir, M. R. [1 ]
Hurley, H. A. [3 ]
Al-Qudah, H. S. [4 ]
Phelan, M. [2 ]
Drachenberg, C. B. [5 ]
Bartlett, S. T. [6 ]
Cooper, M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Irbid, Jordan
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Transplantat, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Delayed graft function (DGF); early graft function; kidney graft function; kidney graft survival; kidney transplantation; laparoscopic technique; live donor transplantation; organ procurement; outcomes; rejection-risk; renal injury; renal recovery; renal transplant recipient; renal transplant; renal transplantation; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE-CENTER; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; ALLOGRAFT FUNCTION; ACUTE REJECTION; OPEN SURGERY; KIDNEY; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; EQUIVALENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02477.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We undertook this study to assess the rate of poor early graft function (EGF) after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (lapNx) and to determine whether poor EGF is associated with diminished long-term graft survival. The study population consisted of 946 consecutive lapNx donors/recipient pairs at our center. Poor EGF was defined as receiving hemodialysis on postoperative day (POD) 1 through POD 7 (delayed graft function [DGF]) or serum creatinine >= 3.0 mg/dL at POD 5 without need for hemodialysis (slow graft function [SGF]). The incidence of poor EGF was 16.3% (DGF 5.8%, SGF 10.5%), and it was stable in chronologic tertiles. Poor EGF was independently associated with worse death-censored graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-3.47, p = 0.001), worse overall graft survival (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.37, p = 0.014), worse acute rejection-free survival (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.92-3.94, p < 0.001) and worse 1-year renal function (p = 0.002). Even SGF independently predicted worse renal allograft survival (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.44-4.44, p = 0.001). Risk factors for poor DGF included advanced donor age, high recipient BMI, sirolimus use and prolonged warm ischemia time. In conclusion, poor EGF following lapNx has a deleterious effect on long-term graft function and survival.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 347
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of graft survival in live donor nephrectomy:: Hand-assisted laparoscopic v open procedures
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    Hong, Jeong Hee
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Kim, Sung Joo
    Lee, Sung Won
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (08) : 866 - 871
  • [42] Convalescence after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.
    Bergman, S
    Feldman, LS
    Carli, F
    Anidjar, M
    Metrakos, PP
    Tchervenkov, JI
    Paraskevas, S
    Klassen, D
    Vassiliou, MC
    Andrew, CG
    Stanbridge, DD
    Fried, GM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 369 - 369
  • [43] Prolonged Ischemic Time, Delayed Graft Function, and Graft and Patient Outcomes in Live Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Krishnan, A. R.
    Wong, G.
    Chapman, J. R.
    Coates, P. T.
    Russ, G. R.
    Pleass, H.
    Russell, C.
    He, B.
    Lim, W. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (09) : 2714 - 2723
  • [44] A prospective evaluation of donor and graft outcomes of 3-D laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single centre experience
    Kumar, Anup
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Yadav, Siddharth
    Prasanth, Y. M.
    Tyagi, Vijay
    Prasad, Vishnu
    Saurav, Kumar
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 72 (01) : 72 - 72
  • [45] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes equivalent to open surgery
    Lee, BR
    Chow, GK
    Ratner, LE
    Kavoussi, LR
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) : 811 - 819
  • [46] HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC LIVING-DONOR NEPHRECTOMY VERSUS OPEN SURGERY: ARE DIFFERENCES IN EARLY GRAFT FUNCTION DETECTABLE?
    Fischer, K.
    Theil, G.
    Weigand, K.
    Fornara, P.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 27 : 36 - 37
  • [47] Open Versus Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Perioperative Parameters and Graft Functions
    Altinel, M.
    Akinci, S.
    Gunes, Z. E.
    Olcucuoglu, E.
    Gonenc, F.
    Yazicioglu, A. H.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (03) : 781 - 786
  • [48] Donor factors influencing graft outcomes in live donor kidney transplantation
    Issa, Naim
    Stephany, Brian
    Fatica, Richard
    Nurko, Saul
    Krishnamurthi, Venkatesh
    Goldfarb, David A.
    Braun, William E.
    Dennis, Vincent W.
    Heeger, Peter S.
    Poggio, Emilio D.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (05) : 593 - 599
  • [49] Graft Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplants Are Better with Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and High Volume Centers.
    Burg, J.
    Scott, D.
    Roayaie, K.
    Maynard, E.
    Barry, J.
    Enestvedt, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 285 - 286
  • [50] Graft size, donor age, and patient status are the indicators of early graft function after living donor liver transplantation
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Harada, Noboru
    Kayashima, Hiroto
    Yamashita, Yo-Ichi
    Soejima, Yuji
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (07) : 1007 - 1013