Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters

被引:27
|
作者
Lovell, A. E. [1 ,2 ]
Nunes, F. M. [1 ,2 ]
Sarich, J. [3 ]
Wild, S. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Natl Superconducting Cyclotron Lab, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Math & Comp Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
NEUTRON-SCATTERING; CROSS-SECTIONS; POTENTIALS; DEUTERONS; PB-208;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024611
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Background: Although uncertainty quantification has been making its way into nuclear theory, these methods have yet to be explored in the context of reaction theory. For example, it is well known that different parameterizations of the optical potential can result in different cross sections, but these differences have not been systematically studied and quantified. Purpose: The purpose of this work is to investigate the uncertainties in nuclear reactions that result from fitting a given model to elastic-scattering data, as well as to study how these uncertainties propagate to the inelastic and transfer channels. Method: We use statistical methods to determine a best fit and create corresponding 95% confidence bands. A simple model of the process is fit to elastic-scattering data and used to predict either inelastic or transfer cross sections. In this initial work, we assume that our model is correct, and the only uncertainties come from the variation of the fit parameters. Results: We study a number of reactions involving neutron and deuteron projectiles with energies in the range of 5-25 MeV/u, on targets with mass A = 12-208. We investigate the correlations between the parameters in the fit. The case of deuterons on C-12 is discussed in detail: the elastic-scattering fit and the prediction of C-12(d, p) C-13 transfer angular distributions, using both uncorrelated and correlated. 2 minimization functions. The general features for all cases are compiled in a systematic manner to identify trends. Conclusions: Our work shows that, in many cases, the correlated chi(2) functions (in comparison to the uncorrelated chi(2) functions) provide a more natural parameterization of the process. These correlated functions do, however, produce broader confidence bands. Further optimization may require improvement in the models themselves and/or more information included in the fit.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] QUANTIFICATION OF MODEL UNCERTAINTY FROM DATA
    DEVRIES, DK
    VANDENHOF, PMJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR CONTROL, 1994, 4 (02) : 301 - 319
  • [32] On Valid Uncertainty Quantification About a Model
    Martin, Ryan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPRECISE PROBABILITIES: THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS (ISIPTA 2019), 2019, 103 : 295 - 303
  • [33] Quantification of model uncertainty in environmental modeling
    Ye, Ming
    Meyer, Philip D.
    Lin, Yu-Feng
    Neuman, Shlomo P.
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2010, 24 (06) : 807 - 808
  • [34] CLOSURE LAW MODEL UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Strand, Andreas
    Kjolaas, Jorn
    Bergstrom, Trond H.
    Steinsland, Ingelin
    Hellevik, Leif Rune
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2022, 12 (03) : 31 - 48
  • [35] On the Quantification of Model Uncertainty: A Bayesian Perspective
    Kaplan, David
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2021, 86 (01) : 215 - 238
  • [36] Bayesian methodology for updating geomechanical parameters and uncertainty quantification
    Miranda, T.
    Correia, A. Gomes
    Ribeiro e Sousa, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2009, 46 (07) : 1144 - 1153
  • [37] Uncertainty quantification of MEMS devices with correlated random parameters
    Lin-Feng Zhao
    Zai-Fa Zhou
    Yi-Qun Song
    Mu-Zi Meng
    Qing-An Huang
    Microsystem Technologies, 2020, 26 : 1689 - 1696
  • [38] Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM
    Dunbar, Oliver R. A.
    Garbuno-Inigo, Alfredo
    Schneider, Tapio
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [39] Uncertainty quantification of MEMS devices with correlated random parameters
    Zhao, Lin-Feng
    Zhou, Zai-Fa
    Song, Yi-Qun
    Meng, Mu-Zi
    Huang, Qing-An
    MICROSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES-MICRO-AND NANOSYSTEMS-INFORMATION STORAGE AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2020, 26 (05): : 1689 - 1696
  • [40] The Uncertainty Quantification for Parameters Optimization in SERF Atomic Magnetomer
    Zhao, Weiyu
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Yu
    Yan, Qingyu
    Song, Qiuyang
    Wang, Chencheng
    Kang, Xiangyu
    Gao, Xiumin
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (22) : 25687 - 25694