Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters

被引:27
|
作者
Lovell, A. E. [1 ,2 ]
Nunes, F. M. [1 ,2 ]
Sarich, J. [3 ]
Wild, S. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Natl Superconducting Cyclotron Lab, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Math & Comp Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
NEUTRON-SCATTERING; CROSS-SECTIONS; POTENTIALS; DEUTERONS; PB-208;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024611
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Background: Although uncertainty quantification has been making its way into nuclear theory, these methods have yet to be explored in the context of reaction theory. For example, it is well known that different parameterizations of the optical potential can result in different cross sections, but these differences have not been systematically studied and quantified. Purpose: The purpose of this work is to investigate the uncertainties in nuclear reactions that result from fitting a given model to elastic-scattering data, as well as to study how these uncertainties propagate to the inelastic and transfer channels. Method: We use statistical methods to determine a best fit and create corresponding 95% confidence bands. A simple model of the process is fit to elastic-scattering data and used to predict either inelastic or transfer cross sections. In this initial work, we assume that our model is correct, and the only uncertainties come from the variation of the fit parameters. Results: We study a number of reactions involving neutron and deuteron projectiles with energies in the range of 5-25 MeV/u, on targets with mass A = 12-208. We investigate the correlations between the parameters in the fit. The case of deuterons on C-12 is discussed in detail: the elastic-scattering fit and the prediction of C-12(d, p) C-13 transfer angular distributions, using both uncorrelated and correlated. 2 minimization functions. The general features for all cases are compiled in a systematic manner to identify trends. Conclusions: Our work shows that, in many cases, the correlated chi(2) functions (in comparison to the uncorrelated chi(2) functions) provide a more natural parameterization of the process. These correlated functions do, however, produce broader confidence bands. Further optimization may require improvement in the models themselves and/or more information included in the fit.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cryptanalysis of an optical cryptosystem with uncertainty quantification in a probabilistic model
    Sun, Xinkai
    Zhang, Sanguo
    Shi, Yishi
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2022, 61 (19) : 5567 - 5574
  • [2] Statistical approach for uncertainty quantification of experimental modal model parameters
    Luczak, M.
    Peeters, B.
    Kahsin, M.
    Branner, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING (ISMA2014) AND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (USD2014), 2014, : 4729 - 4739
  • [3] Uncertainty quantification of parameters in SST turbulence model for inlet simulation
    Zhang K.
    Li S.
    Duan Y.
    Yan C.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44
  • [4] Explainable machine learning model for prediction of ground motion parameters with uncertainty quantification
    Chen Meng
    Wang Hua
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (09): : 3386 - 3404
  • [5] Simultaneous uncertainty quantification of fracture mechanics based life prediction model parameters
    Cross, Richard
    Makeev, Andrew
    Armanios, Erian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2007, 29 (08) : 1510 - 1515
  • [6] Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification for Optical Structures
    Georg, Niklas
    Lehmann, Christian
    Roemer, Ulrich
    Schuhmann, Rolf
    SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (SCEE 2020), 2021, 36 : 127 - 135
  • [7] A hierarchy model for the uncertainty quantification of spatial variability in the constitutive parameters of concrete in structures
    Tao, Jinju
    Chen, Jianbing
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2022, 95
  • [8] Bayesian optical flow with uncertainty quantification
    Sun, Jie
    Quevedo, Fernando J.
    Bolit, Erik
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2018, 34 (10)
  • [9] On the quantification of damping model uncertainty
    Adhikari, S.
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2007, 306 (1-2) : 153 - 171
  • [10] Model reduction for uncertainty quantification
    Ghanem, Roger
    EURODYN 2014: IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, : 3 - 9