Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP

被引:1
|
作者
Cetinyokus, Saliha [1 ]
Caliskan, Emre [2 ]
Aksakal, Erdem [3 ]
Cetinyokus, Tahsin [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Tech Sci Vocat Sch, Mat & Mat Proc Technol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ataturk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; Group decision making; Hazard analysis and consequence modelling software; Likert scale; Software selection; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CRITERIA; ERP; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; DEPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.30492/IJCCE.2020.34118
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Software evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the physical effect distances of the explosion, fire and toxic emission, which is an important need for industrial institutions containing, using or storing hazardous chemicals. The evaluation and selection of software for the Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) of potential accidents was studied at first. In means of methodology, questionnaires consisting of original questions were applied to the experts. The results obtained from questionnaires according to the Likert scale, were converted into Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggestion matrices. In this way the inconsistency problem in the pairwise comparison matrices were eliminated. As a result, evaluation and selection were made among the HACM softwares.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research and Application on Improved group decision making AHP algorithm
    Zhang, Jiandong
    Yang, Jin
    Ma, Xuan
    Gong, Juanjuan
    INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS II, PTS 1-3, 2013, 336-338 : 1656 - +
  • [32] Modelling experts' attitudes in group decision making
    Palomares, I.
    Liu, J.
    Xu, Y.
    Martinez, L.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 16 (10) : 1755 - 1766
  • [33] Modelling experts’ attitudes in group decision making
    I. Palomares
    J. Liu
    Y. Xu
    L. Martínez
    Soft Computing, 2012, 16 : 1755 - 1766
  • [34] Methods for assigning weights to decision makers in group ahp decision-making
    Jankovic A.
    Popovic M.
    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2019, 2 (01): : 147 - 165
  • [35] The Research of BPM Software Trustworthy Evaluation Model (based on AHP and group decision-making in linguistic scale)
    Hou Hong
    Song QinBao
    Hou Hong
    Yang Jing
    Hao KeGang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, VOL III, 2009, : 815 - +
  • [36] Software project management tools: Making a practical decision using AHP
    Ahmad, Norita
    Laplante, Phillip A.
    30TH ANNUAL IEEE/NASA SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 76 - +
  • [37] Enterprise modelling for decision-making in the software ecosystem
    Rani, Anshul
    Mishra, Deepti
    Omerovic, Aida
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [38] AHP multicriteria decision making for ranking life cycle assessment software
    Ines, Hammami Hafsa
    Ben Ammar, Faouzi
    2015 6th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), 2015,
  • [39] An integrated fuzzy group decision making approach for evaluation and selection of best simulation software packages
    Azadeh, Ali
    Nazari-Shirkouhi, Salman
    Samadi, Homa
    Nazari-Shirkouhi, Amin
    International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2014, (02) : 256 - 282