Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP

被引:1
|
作者
Cetinyokus, Saliha [1 ]
Caliskan, Emre [2 ]
Aksakal, Erdem [3 ]
Cetinyokus, Tahsin [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Tech Sci Vocat Sch, Mat & Mat Proc Technol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ataturk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; Group decision making; Hazard analysis and consequence modelling software; Likert scale; Software selection; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CRITERIA; ERP; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; DEPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.30492/IJCCE.2020.34118
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Software evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the physical effect distances of the explosion, fire and toxic emission, which is an important need for industrial institutions containing, using or storing hazardous chemicals. The evaluation and selection of software for the Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) of potential accidents was studied at first. In means of methodology, questionnaires consisting of original questions were applied to the experts. The results obtained from questionnaires according to the Likert scale, were converted into Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggestion matrices. In this way the inconsistency problem in the pairwise comparison matrices were eliminated. As a result, evaluation and selection were made among the HACM softwares.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection
    Lai, VS
    Wong, BK
    Cheung, WM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 137 (01) : 134 - 144
  • [2] IMPROVED AHP-GROUP DECISION MAKING FOR INVESTMENT STRATEGY SELECTION
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Ergu, Daji
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2012, 18 (02) : 299 - 316
  • [3] Hybrid Use of Likert Scale-Based AHP and PROMETHEE Methods for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) Software Selection
    Caliskan, Emre
    Aksakal, Erdem
    Cetinyokus, Saliha
    Cetinyokus, Tahsin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2019, 18 (05) : 1689 - 1715
  • [4] Decision Making With AHP For Selection Of Employee
    Sari, Ria Eka
    Meizar, Abdul
    Tanjung, Dahriani Hakim
    Nugroho, Ahir Yugo
    2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER AND IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT (CITSM 2017), 2017, : 351 - 355
  • [5] ELIGERE: a Fuzzy AHP Distributed Software Platform for Group Decision Making in Engineering Design
    Grazioso, Stanislao
    Selvaggio, Mario
    Marzullo, Domenico
    Di Gironimo, Giuseppe
    Gospodarczyk, Mateusz
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017,
  • [6] AHP-Based Group Decision Making Approach to Supplier Selection of Irrigation Equipment
    Dragincic, Jovana
    Vranesevic, Milica
    WATER RESOURCES, 2014, 41 (06) : 782 - 791
  • [7] AHP-based group decision making approach to supplier selection of irrigation equipment
    Jovana Draginčić
    Milica Vranešević
    Water Resources, 2014, 41 : 782 - 791
  • [8] A multi criteria group decision making approach for collaborative software selection problem
    Kara, Selin Soner
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 26 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [9] A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS-Based Group Decision-Making Approach to IT Personnel Selection
    Samanlioglu, Funda
    Taskaya, Yunus Emre
    Gulen, Utku Can
    Cokcan, Ogulcan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (05) : 1576 - 1591
  • [10] A Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS-Based Group Decision-Making Approach to IT Personnel Selection
    Funda Samanlioglu
    Yunus Emre Taskaya
    Utku Can Gulen
    Ogulcan Cokcan
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 1576 - 1591