A Multiparametric Serum Marker Panel as a Complementary Test to Mammography for the Diagnosis of Node-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer and DCIS in Young Women

被引:19
|
作者
Lacombe, Jerome [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mange, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bougnoux, Anne-Claire [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prassas, Ioannis [4 ,5 ]
Solassol, Jerome [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montpellier, Dept Biopathol, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier I, Montpellier, France
[3] CRLC Val dAurelle, Dept Clin Oncoprote, Montpellier, France
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN; IN-SITU; AUTOANTIBODIES; DENSITY; PROTEIN; IDENTIFICATION; ANTIBODIES; CARCINOMA; BIOMARKER; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0267
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The sensitivity of mammography for the detection of small lesions, including node-negative early-stage (T1N0) primary breast cancer (PBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is significantly decreased in young patients. From a clinical standpoint, an inconclusive mammogram reflects the inability of clinicians to confidently decide whether patients should be referred for biopsy or for follow-up with repeat imaging. Methods: Specific ELISAs were developed for a panel of 13 well-recognized breast autoantigens (HSP60, FKBP52, PRDX2, PPIA, MUC1, GAL3, PAK2, P53, CCNB1, PHB2, RACK1, RUVBL1, and HER2). Circulating autoantibody levels were measured in a cohort of 396 serum samples from histologically confirmed DCIS (n = 87) or T1N0 PBC (n = 153) and healthy controls (n = 156). Results: Individually, antibodies against CCNB1, FKBP52, GAL3, PAK2, PRDX2, PPIA, P53, and MUC1 demonstrated discriminatory power between breast cancer and healthy control groups. At 90% sensitivity, the overall combined specificity of the autoantibody serum screening test was 42%. Adjustment for higher sensitivities of 95% and 99% resulted in 30% and 21% specificities, respectively (33% and 18% in T1N0 PBC and 28% and 21% in DCIS). Finally, in patients with node-negative early-stage breast cancer younger than 50 years, the autoantibody assay exhibited 59% specificity with a fixed sensitivity at 90%. Conclusions: Our autoantibody panel allows accurate detection of early breast cancer and DCIS, notably in younger patients. Impact: Clinical assessment of this autoantibody panel displays a potential to facilitate clinical management of early-stage breast cancer detection in cases of inconclusive mammogram. (C) 2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1834 / 1842
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Helical Tomotherapy of Lymph Node-negative Early-stage Breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery: Long-term Results
    Zwicker, Felix
    Klepper, Rudolf
    Hauswald, Henrik
    Hoefel, Sebastian
    Raether, Luis
    Huber, Peter E.
    Debus, Juergen
    Schempp, Michael
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (05) : 2041 - 2053
  • [32] AXILLARY LYMPHADENECTOMY VS. SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY FOR EARLY-STAGE CLINICALLY NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Christidis, Panagiotis
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Liberis, Anastasios
    Vavouldis, Eleftherios
    Margioula-Siarkou, Georgia
    Papanikolaou, Alexios
    Mavromatidis, George
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A2 - A3
  • [33] Identification and validation of a serum microRNA panel for detection of early-stage breast cancer.
    Zou, Ruiyang
    Zhou, Lihan
    Loke, Sau Yeen
    Heng-Phon Too
    Lee, Ann
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [34] Omission of axillary lymph node dissection for clinically node negative early-stage breast cancer patients
    Kobayashi, Reiko
    Shiraishi, Kenshiro
    Iwase, Satoru
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    BREAST CANCER, 2015, 22 (06) : 657 - 663
  • [35] Omission of axillary lymph node dissection for clinically node negative early-stage breast cancer patients
    Reiko Kobayashi
    Kenshiro Shiraishi
    Satoru Iwase
    Kuni Ohtomo
    Keiichi Nakagawa
    Breast Cancer, 2015, 22 : 657 - 663
  • [36] How Much Is Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Impacting the Adjuvant Treatment Management of Node-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients?
    Nguyen, M. T.
    Chen, Z.
    D'Alfonso, T.
    Stessin, A.
    Nagar, H.
    Hayes, M.
    Shin, S. J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 59A - 59A
  • [37] MDM2 amplification is an independent prognostic feature of node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer
    Choschzick, Matthias
    Heilenkoetter, Uwe
    Lebeau, Annette
    Jaenicke, Fritz
    Terracciano, Luigi
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Sauter, Guido
    Simon, Ronald
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2010, 8 (02) : 53 - 60
  • [38] Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Krug, David
    Vladimirova, Valentina
    Untch, Michael
    Kuhn, Thorsten
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Denkert, Carsten
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Solbach, Christine
    Gerber, Bernd
    Tesch, Hans
    Golatta, Michael
    Seiler, Sabine
    Heil, Joerg
    Nekljudova, Valentina
    Holtschmidt, Johannes
    Loibl, Sibylle
    BREAST, 2024, 74
  • [39] How Much Is Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Impacting the Adjuvant Treatment Management of Node-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients?
    Nguyen, M. T.
    Chen, Z.
    D'Alfonso, T.
    Stessin, A.
    Nagar, H.
    Hayes, M.
    Shin, S. J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 59A - 59A
  • [40] Axillary lymph node dissection vs. sentinel node biopsy for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Christidis, Panagiotis
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Liberis, Anastasios
    Vavoulidis, Eleftherios
    Margioula-Siarkou, Georgia
    Vatopoulou, Anastasia
    Papanikolaou, Alexios
    Mavromatidis, George
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1221 - 1234