INVALID VOTING IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND IN NEW DEMOCRACIES

被引:0
|
作者
Jarabinsky, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Evaluat & Social Anal, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
D O I
10.5817/PC2019-2-135
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 138
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New pears from the Czech Republic
    Paprstein, F
    Bouma, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM ON FRUIT BREEDING AND GENETICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, (538): : 741 - 744
  • [32] Women's Parliamentary Representation in the Czech Republic: Does Preference Voting Matter?
    Stegmaier, Mary
    Tosun, Jale
    Vlachova, Klara
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES, 2014, 28 (01) : 187 - 204
  • [33] Comparing democracies 2: New challenges in the study of elections and voting.
    Maisel, LS
    WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2003, 26 (02) : 188 - 189
  • [34] An Empirical Analysis of Invalid Voting in Municipal Elections
    Castro, Vitor
    Martins, Rodrigo
    Sakurai, Sergio Naruhiko
    KYKLOS, 2024,
  • [35] COMPULSORY VOTING, INVALID BALLOTS, AND ABSTENTION IN BRAZIL
    POWER, TJ
    ROBERTS, JT
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1995, 48 (04) : 795 - 826
  • [36] Legitimacy and the Paradox of Technocratic Government in Newer European Democracies: The Fischer Administration in the Czech Republic Revisited
    Hanley, Sean
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES, 2018, 32 (01) : 78 - 100
  • [37] Winning coalitions in plurality voting democracies
    van den Brink, Rene
    Dimitrov, Dinko
    Rusinowska, Agnieszka
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2021, 56 (03) : 509 - 530
  • [38] THE STRUCTURE OF ISSUE VOTING IN POSTINDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACIES
    Hellwig, Timothy
    SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2014, 55 (04): : 596 - 624
  • [39] Winning coalitions in plurality voting democracies
    René van den Brink
    Dinko Dimitrov
    Agnieszka Rusinowska
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2021, 56 : 509 - 530
  • [40] Voting Options in Eastern Europe. Case Study: Romania, Czech Republic and Poland
    Roescu, Andra
    EUROPOLITY-CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE, 2008, 2 (03): : 66 - 71