Development of SNAr Nucleophilic Fluorination: A Fruitful Academia-Industry Collaboration

被引:54
|
作者
See, Yi Yang [1 ]
Morales-Colon, Maria T. [1 ]
Bland, Douglas C. [2 ]
Sanford, Melanie S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Chem, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Corteva Agrisci, Prod & Proc Technol R&D, Indianapolis, IN 46268 USA
关键词
TETRAMETHYLAMMONIUM FLUORIDE; AROMATIC FLUORINATION; SITU GENERATION; HALEX REACTION; CONVERSION; PALLADIUM; SALTS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00471
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The identification of reliable, general, and high yielding methods for the formation of C(sp(2))-fluorine bonds remains a major challenge for synthetic organic chemists. A very common approach involves nucleophilic aromatic fluorination (SNAr fluorination) reactions of aryl chlorides or nitroarenes. Despite being known for more than a century, traditional SNAr fluorination reactions suffer from significant limitations, particularly on a process scale. These include the high cost of common reagents [e.g., cesium fluoride (CsF)], a requirement for elevated temperatures and long reaction times, poor functional group tolerance, and the need for rigorous exclusion of water. This Account summarizes our collaboration with Corteva Agriscience (previously Dow Agrosciences) to address many of these challenges. This collaboration has provided a platform for fundamental scientific advances involving the development of new methods, reagents, and substrates for mild and high yielding nudeophilic fluorination reactions. Our early studies established that the combination of potassium fluoride (KF) and superstoichiometric tetrabutylammonium chloride (Bu4NCl) serves as a cost-effective alternative to CsF for the SNAr fluorination of chloropicolinate substrates. However, these reactions still require elevated temperatures (>130 degrees C) and afford moderate yields due to competing decomposition of the substrate and product. The need for high temperature is largely due to slow reaction rates resulting from the low concentration of the active fluorinating reagent [anhydrous tetrabutylammonium fluoride (Bu4NF)] under these conditions. To address this issue, we developed several strategies for generating high concentration solutions of anhydrous tetraalkylammonium fluoride in situ by combining fluorine-containing electrophiles (e.g., hexafluorobenzene, acyl fluorides, sulfonyl fluorides) with tetraalkylammonium nucleophiles (R4NCN or R4NOR). These systems enable SNAr fluorination under unusually mild conditions, affording nearly quantitative yield with chloropicolinate substrates at room temperature. However, the high cost of the electrophiles and the generation of large quantities of byproducts in the R4NF-forming step render this approach unsuitable for process scale applications. As an alternative, we next explored anhydrous tetramethylammonium fluoride (Me4NF) for these transformations. This highly reactive fluoride source can be synthesized directly from inexpensive KF and Me4NCl and then dried by heating under vacuum. Unlike Bu4NF, it is not susceptible to Hofmann elimination. As such, anhydrous Me4NF is stable and isolable, as well as highly effective for the room temperature SNAr fluorination of chloropicolinates and other electron deficient substrates. The studies with anhydrous R4NF drew our attention to another challenge associated with traditional SNAr fluorination reactions: their limitation to substrates bearing resonance electron-withdrawing groups. We hypothesized that this challenge could be addressed by circumventing the Meisenheimer intermediate, a canonical mechanistic feature of SNAr fluorination. By designing reactions that involve an alternative concerted delivery of the fluoride to the ipso C(sp(2)) center, we developed a deoxyfluorination of arylfluorosulfonates using anhydrous Me4NF. This reaction exhibits a broad scope with respect to the aryl electrophile, with substrates bearing both electron-withdrawing (CN, ester, CF3, Cl) and moderately electron donating (phenyl, alkyl) substituents participating in deoxyfluorination. These deoxyfluorination conditions were also expanded to nonaromatic substrates, including aldehydes and benzylic/aliphatic alcohols. This Account concludes by delineating several ongoing challenges and opportunities in this fast-moving field. For instance, one important future direction will be to address the high moisture sensitivity of these transformations. In addition, the application of these new reagents and methods in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and PET imaging agents will continue to test the versatility and functional group compatibility of these methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2372 / 2383
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] When Less Is More: An Avenue for Academia-Industry Collaboration in Pediatric Cancer
    Sasi, Archana
    Bakhshi, Shikhar
    Ganguly, Shuvadeep
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [32] Potential of Community of Practice in Promoting Academia-Industry Collaboration: A Case Study
    Pohjola, Ilpo
    Puusa, Anu
    Iskanius, Paivi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2015), 2015, : 206 - 212
  • [33] Academia-industry collaboration program in a hybrid e-leaming environment
    Okamoto, T
    Kayama, M
    ICT'2003: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLS I AND II, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1770 - 1777
  • [34] Channels of interaction and past collaborative experience as imperatives in academia-industry collaboration
    Bhullar, Supreet S.
    Nangia, Vinay K.
    Batish, Ajay
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2017, 29 (10) : 1210 - 1224
  • [35] The RA-MAP Consortium: a working model for academia-industry collaboration
    Cope, Andrew P.
    Barnes, Michael R.
    Belson, Alexandra
    Binks, Michael
    Brockbank, Sarah
    Bonachela-Capdevila, Francisco
    Carini, Claudio
    Fisher, Benjamin A.
    Goodyear, Carl S.
    Emery, Paul
    Ehrenstein, Michael R.
    Gozzard, Neil
    Harris, Ray
    Hollis, Sally
    Keidel, Sarah
    Levesque, Marc
    Lindholm, Catharina
    McDermott, Michael F.
    McInnes, Iain B.
    Mela, Christopher M.
    Parker, Gerry
    Read, Simon
    Pedersen, Ayako Wakatsuki
    Ponchel, Frederique
    Porter, Duncan
    Rao, Ravi
    Rowe, Anthony
    Schulze-Knappe, Peter
    Sleeman, Matthew A.
    Symmons, Deborah
    Taylor, Peter C.
    Tom, Brian
    Tsuji, Wayne
    Verbeeck, Denny
    Isaacs, John D.
    NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 14 (01) : 53 - +
  • [36] Academia-industry gap in India
    Mukund, N
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2003, 84 (05): : 615 - 615
  • [37] THE CHANGING APPROACH IN ACADEMIA-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: FROM PROFIT ORIENTATION TO INNOVATION SUPPORT
    Kelli, Aleksei
    Mets, Tonis
    Jonsson, Lars
    Pisuke, Heiki
    Adamsoo, Reet
    TRAMES-JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (03): : 215 - 241
  • [38] Academia-industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises
    Hou, Bojun
    Hong, Jin
    Wang, Hongying
    Zhou, Chongyang
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2019, 31 (06) : 692 - 706
  • [39] A network perspective of academia-industry nanotechnology collaboration: A comparison of Canada and the United States
    Moazami, Afshin
    Ebadi, Ashkan
    Schiffauerova, Andrea
    COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9 (02) : 263 - 293
  • [40] Strengthening the Bridge Between Academic and the Industry Through the Academia-Industry Collaboration Plan Design Model
    Ahmed, Farah
    Fattani, Muhammad Tahir
    Ali, Syed Rizwan
    Enam, Rabia Noor
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13