Ventricular assist devices in a contemporary pediatric cohort: Morbidity, functional recovery, and survival

被引:38
|
作者
Stein, Mary Lynette [1 ,2 ]
Dao, Duy T. [3 ]
Doan, Lan N. [3 ]
Reinhartz, Olaf [4 ]
Maeda, Katsuhide [4 ]
Hollander, Seth A. [5 ]
Yeh, Justin [6 ]
Kaufman, Beth D. [5 ]
Almond, Christopher S. [5 ]
Rosenthal, David N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford Hosp & Clin, Dept Pediat, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Hosp & Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Div Pediat Cardiac Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Cardiol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Div Pediat Cardiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
关键词
pediatric heart transplant; ventricular assist device; bridge to transplant; Treatment Intensity Score; survival; PediMACS; INTERMACS ANNUAL-REPORT; HEART-FAILURE; BRIDGING CHILDREN; US CHILDREN; TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; CARDIOMYOPATHY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2015.06.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Limited availability of donor organs has led to the use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) to treat heart failure in pediatric patients, primarily as bridge to transplantation. How effective VAD therapy is in promoting functional recovery in children is currently not known. METHODS: We report morbidity and mortality as defined by the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Modified for Pediatrics (PediMACS) and the use of the Treatment Intensity Score to assess functional status for 50 VAD patients supported at a single pediatric program from 2004 to 2013. RESULTS: In this cohort, 30-day survival on VAD was 98%, and 180-day survival was 83%. Stroke occurred in 11 patients (22%), with 8 (16%) resulting in persistent neurologic deficit or death. The adverse event rate was 2-fold to 3-fold higher in the first 7 days of support compared with the subsequent support period. Functional status, as measured by the Treatment Intensity Score, improved with duration of support. Successful bridge to transplantation was associated with fewer adverse events during support and greater improvement in the Treatment Intensity Score during the period of support. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival in this cohort is excellent. The risk of serious adverse events decreases over the first month of support. However, a clinically significant risk of morbidity and mortality persists for the duration of pediatric VAD support. Measures of functional status improve with duration of support and are associated with survival to transplantation. (C) 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 98
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Myocardial recovery: a focus on the impact of left ventricular assist devices
    Halbreiner, M. Scott
    Cruz, Vincent
    Starling, Randall
    Soltesz, Edward
    Smedira, Nicholas
    Moravec, Christine
    Moazami, Nader
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 12 (05) : 589 - 600
  • [42] Outpatient Outcomes of Pediatric Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Chen, Sharon
    Lin, Aileen
    Liu, Esther
    Gowan, Maryalice
    May, Lindsay J.
    Doan, Lan N.
    Almond, Christopher S.
    Maeda, Katsuhide
    Reinhartz, Olaf
    Hollander, Seth A.
    Rosenthal, David N.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [43] Thrombosis and Bleeding Complications in Pediatric Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices
    Conway, J.
    Manlhiot, C.
    Dipchand, A. I.
    McCrindle, B.
    Humpl, T.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S290 - S290
  • [44] Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Patients-Stasis or Progress?
    Mazwi, Mjaye
    Schwartz, Steven M.
    Jeewa, Aamir
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (08) : 784 - 785
  • [45] Pediatric ventricular assist devices: what are the key considerations and requirements?
    Hetzer, Roland
    Javier, Mariano Francisco del Maria
    Javier Delmo, Eva Maria
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (01) : 57 - 74
  • [46] Right heart failure considerations in pediatric ventricular assist devices
    Law, Sabrina P.
    Morales, David L. S.
    Si, Ming-Sing
    Friedland-Little, Joshua M.
    Joong, Anna
    Bearl, David W.
    Bansal, Neha
    Sutcliffe, David L.
    Philip, Joseph
    Mehegan, Mary
    Simpson, Kathleen E.
    Conway, Jennifer
    Peng, David M.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 25 (03)
  • [47] Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients with Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Devices
    Burton, C.
    Forgie, S.
    Rutledge, J.
    Lequier, L.
    Conradi, A.
    Guerra, G. Garcia
    Ross, D.
    Rebeyka, I.
    Buchholz, H.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : S163 - S163
  • [48] Physiological Control of Pulsatile and Rotary Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices
    Melo, T. R.
    Cordeiro, T. D.
    Cestari, I. A.
    da Rocha Neto, J. S.
    Lima, A. M. N.
    XXVII BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, CBEB 2020, 2022, : 213 - 219
  • [49] Comment on: Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients
    McKenna, Maria
    Clark, Stephen C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (10): : 1275 - 1276
  • [50] The Use of Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices in Children's Hospitals From 2000 to 2010: Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Charges
    Mansfield, Robert T.
    Lin, Kimberly Y.
    Zaoutis, Theoklis
    Mott, Antonio R.
    Mohamad, Zeinab
    Luan, Xianqun
    Kaufman, Beth D.
    Ravishankar, Chitra
    Gaynor, J. William
    Shaddy, Robert E.
    Rossano, Joseph W.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (06) : 522 - 528