Nuclear criticality accident safety, near misses and classification

被引:7
|
作者
Hodges, Matthew S. [1 ]
Sanders, Charlotta E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Las Vegas UNLV, Dept Mech Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Nuclear Criticality Safety; Nuclear criticality accidents; Criticality near misses; Criticality event classification system;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.018
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The majority of known nuclear criticality accidents occurred during the 1950s and 1960s, this during a time when nuclear science was young and safety measures to deal with this new science were not fully understood. As the progression in the development of technology occurred, a new understanding for a focus on establishing a safety culture within the nuclear industry developed, this in turn has led over the decades post ceding the early years of nuclear, a decrease in the number of nuclear criticality incidents. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief summary of historical (pre 2000) criticality accident statistics and conclusions, while focusing on nuclear criticality incidents occurring after 2000. In preparing the historical overview statistics, it was found that there were several Russian submarine nuclear criticality accidents occurring before 2000 that were not previously widely presented in the public domain. Furthermore, noted were instances of Japanese power companies covering up rod withdrawal accidents, leading to unintended nuclear criticalities. To add in this other information to previously understood practices, a new method of characterizing criticality accident near misses is to be presented, followed by data analysis showing that the safety culture that has evolved since the emergence of nuclear energy on the world stage has provided the platform for the development of a strong and relevant nuclear criticality safety stance. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Near misses in bladder cancer - an airline safety approach to urology
    Singh, R
    Saleemi, A
    Walsh, K
    Popert, R
    O'Brien, T
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (06) : 378 - 381
  • [42] NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY AUDITS - AN NRC OVERVIEW
    ROTH, J
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1984, 46 : 444 - 444
  • [43] REVIEW OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY TOPICAL MEETING
    SMITH, DR
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1967, 8 (04): : 323 - &
  • [44] UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY COMPUTATIONS
    Ao, Qi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 3, 2011, : 345 - 351
  • [45] The Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program
    Felty, JR
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR DATA FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 769 : 53 - 58
  • [46] ELEMENTS OF A GOOD NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY PROGRAM
    MCLENDON, JD
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1972, 15 (01): : 302 - &
  • [47] NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY TRAINING IN PRIVATE SECTOR
    ALCORN, FM
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1977, 27 (NOV): : 401 - 402
  • [48] SAFETY-CRITICALITY IN NUCLEAR-PLANTS
    LECLERC, J
    MAUBERT, L
    PUIT, JC
    BULLETIN D INFORMATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES ET TECHNIQUES DU COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE, 1975, (208): : 49 - 67
  • [49] Progress in Research of Nuclear Criticality Safety Technology
    Zhu Q.
    Zhou Q.
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2020, 54 : 226 - 232
  • [50] A REVIEW OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY - THEORY AND PRACTICE
    WACHTER, JW
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1986, 27 (02): : 177 - 178