Nuclear criticality accident safety, near misses and classification

被引:7
|
作者
Hodges, Matthew S. [1 ]
Sanders, Charlotta E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Las Vegas UNLV, Dept Mech Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Nuclear Criticality Safety; Nuclear criticality accidents; Criticality near misses; Criticality event classification system;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.018
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The majority of known nuclear criticality accidents occurred during the 1950s and 1960s, this during a time when nuclear science was young and safety measures to deal with this new science were not fully understood. As the progression in the development of technology occurred, a new understanding for a focus on establishing a safety culture within the nuclear industry developed, this in turn has led over the decades post ceding the early years of nuclear, a decrease in the number of nuclear criticality incidents. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief summary of historical (pre 2000) criticality accident statistics and conclusions, while focusing on nuclear criticality incidents occurring after 2000. In preparing the historical overview statistics, it was found that there were several Russian submarine nuclear criticality accidents occurring before 2000 that were not previously widely presented in the public domain. Furthermore, noted were instances of Japanese power companies covering up rod withdrawal accidents, leading to unintended nuclear criticalities. To add in this other information to previously understood practices, a new method of characterizing criticality accident near misses is to be presented, followed by data analysis showing that the safety culture that has evolved since the emergence of nuclear energy on the world stage has provided the platform for the development of a strong and relevant nuclear criticality safety stance. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on nuclear criticality safety and accident risk evaluation for nuclear fuel cycle facilities
    Kouzmine, SK
    Ryazanov, BG
    Sviridov, VI
    Frolov, VV
    NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY MANAGEMENT VOL II, 1999, 27 : 43 - 51
  • [2] NUCLEAR-ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY IN A SIMULATED CRITICALITY ACCIDENT
    SANTORO, RT
    AFFEL, RG
    CAIN, GC
    GREENE, JH
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1974, 19 (OCT27): : 195 - 196
  • [3] Update of the Nuclear Criticality Slide Rule for the Emergency Response to a Nuclear Criticality Accident
    Duluc, Matthieu
    Bardelay, Aurelie
    Celik, Cihangir
    Heinrichs, Dave
    Hopper, Calvin
    Jones, Richard
    Kim, Soon
    Miller, Thomas
    Troisne, Marc
    Wilson, Chris
    ICRS-13 & RPSD-2016, 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATION SHIELDING & 19TH TOPICAL MEETING OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION AND SHIELDING DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY - 2016, 2017, 153
  • [4] Nuclear criticality safety
    1995, (73):
  • [5] Patient safety Importance of near misses
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Nagpal, Kamal
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339
  • [6] PERFORMANCE OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS
    SWAJA, RE
    SIMS, CS
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 38 (JUN): : 586 - 587
  • [7] Nuclear Safety and Nuclear Accident
    不详
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2011, 8 (03) : 111 - 112
  • [8] AN OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY
    SMITH, DR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 38 (JUN): : 20 - 20
  • [9] Near Misses and Their Importance for Improving Patient Safety
    Sheikhtaheri, Abbas
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 43 (06) : 853 - 854
  • [10] GUIDANCE IN NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY
    THOMAS, JT
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1971, 14 (01): : 32 - &