Identifying the students' corrective textual actions towards teachers feedback

被引:0
|
作者
Ulper, Hakan [1 ]
Cetinkaya, Gokhan
机构
[1] Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ, Dept Turkish Language Educ, TR-15100 Burdur, Turkey
关键词
Writing process; feedback; feedback typ;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.198
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of present research, to analyze deal of requirements that middle and high school students" fulfillments towards the teachers' feedback comparatively. Research was carried out two groups randomly determined one from middle and other from high school. These groups were asked to produce a short essay in text type. After these texts were collected and evaluated by researchers. Feedback was projected by making explanations on the paper. In the research carried out by ulper (2012), It is indicated that teachers give feedback according to content formation, coherence, word usage, language use, mechanical properties, paper order, holistic quality and text type category. This framework was based on feedback upon students' texts. In the middle stage, the texts were given back to the students and they were asked to rewrite the texts by making adjustments based on that feedbacks. In the last stage, all texts were collected and it was identified that the students' overwrites relating to which feedback categories. According to the result of our study, it has been evidently revealed that students require assistance when correcting. Besides, the students performed a higher rate of acceptable corrections for topic requiring less cognitive effort such as paper layout, mechanic properties. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 230
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Different Students, Different Corrective Feedback
    施瑞
    校园英语, 2016, (13) : 18 - 21
  • [22] TEACHERS' AND STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS FEEDBACK: CONTRADICTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
    Azbel, A. A.
    Ilyushin, L. S.
    Kazakova, E. I.
    Morozova, P. A.
    OBRAZOVANIE I NAUKA-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2022, 24 (07): : 76 - 109
  • [23] Development of a formative assessment instrument to determine students' need for corrective actions in physics: Identifying students' functional level of understanding
    Pals, Frits F. B.
    Tolboom, Jos L. J.
    Suhre, Cor J. M.
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 50
  • [24] Students' Perceptions of Teachers' Corrective Feedback, Basic Psychological Needs and Subjective Vitality: A Multilevel Approach
    Vergara-Torres, Argenis P.
    Tristan, Jose
    Lopez-Walle, Jeanette M.
    Gonzalez-Gallegos, Alejandra
    Pappous, Athanasios
    Tomas, Ines
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [25] Exploring the Effects of Peer Review and Teachers' Corrective Feedback on EFL Students' Online Writing Performance
    Tai, Hung-Cheng
    Lin, Wen-Chuan
    Yang, Shu Ching
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (02) : 284 - 309
  • [26] Towards effective feedback: an investigation of teachers' and students' perceptions of oral feedback in classroom practice
    van der Kleij, Fabienne
    Adie, Lenore
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (03) : 252 - 270
  • [27] Exploring Student Errors, Teachers' Corrective Feedback, Learner Uptake and Repair, and Learners' Preferences of Corrective Feedback
    Sung, Ko-Yin
    Tsai, Hsiao-Mei
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2014, 4 (01): : 37 - 54
  • [28] INCONSISTENCIES AMONG EFL TEACHERS IN WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
    Unaldi, I.
    INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 1319 - 1319
  • [29] Teachers' Choice and Learners' Preference of Corrective Feedback Types
    Yoshida, Reiko
    LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2008, 17 (01) : 78 - 93
  • [30] Oral corrective feedback: teachers' concerns and researchers' orientation
    Sepehrinia, Sajjad
    Mehdizadeh, Mostafa
    LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2018, 46 (04): : 483 - 500