Promising horticultural crops for production in high tunnels in the mid-atlantic area of the United States

被引:11
|
作者
Orzolek, MD [1 ]
Lamont, W [1 ]
White, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Hort, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
PROTECTED CULTIVATION 2002: IN SEARCH OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND PLANT MATERIALS FOR SUSTAINABLE GREENHOUSE PRODUCTION | 2004年 / 633期
关键词
plastic mulch; drip irrigation; environmental modification; vegetables; small fruits;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.633.56
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
At The Pennsylvania State University High Tunnel Research and Education Facility located at the Horticulture Research Farm, Rock Springs, PA, there are twenty-eight (5.2 x 11.0 m) research high tunnel units. The Penn State high tunnels were designed so that the endwalls can be raised up to facilitate easy access into the tunnel for a small tractor, rototiller and other machinery. Since the inception of the high tunnel facility in the Fall of 1999, there have been many horticultural crops grown in the high tunnels including; many vegetables, small fruits, cut flowers, herbs, and tree fruits. Generally there are at least two crops and sometime three crops grown in each high tunnel per year depending on time to maturity of the crop and the crops optimum growing temperatures. Of these crops, the most promising in terms of economics were tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum), bell pepper (Capsicum annuum), garlic (Allium sativum), sweet Spanish onion (Allium cepa), red raspberry (Rubus idaeas), blackberries (Rubus allegheniensis) and cut flowers. Most insect problems in the high tunnel have been controlled with the release of biological organisms. There tend to be very few annual weeds in the tunnels, but it is important to control perennial weeds prior to establishing a crop in the high tunnels. The only serious disease problem that has been encountered in high tunnel crop production has been powdery mildew. Use of powdery mildew resistant varieties helps to control this disease in high tunnels.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 458
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Flood Nonstationarity in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States
    Barros, Ana P.
    Duan, Yajuan
    Brun, Julien
    Medina, Miguel A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (10)
  • [12] SEAWEED BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE MID-ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED-STATES
    SEARLES, RB
    HELGOLANDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN, 1984, 38 (3-4): : 259 - 271
  • [13] Landscape Trends in Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States Ecoregions
    Jerry A. Griffith
    Stephen V. Stehman
    Thomas R. Loveland
    Environmental Management, 2003, 32 : 572 - 588
  • [14] Cultivation of kenaf and sunn hemp in the mid-Atlantic United States
    Bhardwaj, HL
    Webber, CL
    Sakamoto, GS
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2005, 22 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [15] Geographic Distribution of Ophiosphaerella Species in the Mid-Atlantic United States
    Hutchens, Wendell J.
    Henderson, Caleb A.
    Bush, Elizabeth A.
    Kerns, James P.
    McCall, David S.
    PLANT HEALTH PROGRESS, 2022, 23 (01): : 93 - 100
  • [16] Drivers and Buffers of Stream Flashiness in the Mid-Atlantic United States
    Hurley, Rachel
    Brandes, David
    Kelleher, Christa
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2024, 38 (10)
  • [17] Agronomic and economic evaluation of fungicide seed treatments for soybean production in the Mid-Atlantic United States
    Kness, A.
    Kleczewski, N. M.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (10) : 148 - 148
  • [18] Baby Ginger Production Under Different Growing Systems in The Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States
    Elias, S.
    Johnson, G. C.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : NR5 - NR5
  • [19] Agronomic and economic evaluation of fungicide seed treatments for soybean production in the mid-Atlantic United States
    Kness, Andrew
    Kleczewski, Nathan M.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (12) : 16 - 16
  • [20] Comparison of soil test extractants used in Mid-Atlantic United States
    Gartley, KL
    Sims, JT
    Olsen, CT
    Chu, P
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2002, 33 (5-6) : 873 - 895