Effects of lovastatin on cognitive function and psychological well-being

被引:236
|
作者
Muldoon, MF
Barger, SD
Ryan, CM
Flory, JD
Lehoczky, JP
Matthews, KA
Manuck, SB
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Clin Pharmacol, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Behav Physiol Lab, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Stat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2000年 / 108卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00353-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Animal research and cross-sectional studies suggest that serum lipid concentrations may influence cognitive function, mood, and behavior, but few clinical trials have studied these effects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind investigation, 209 generally healthy adults with a serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of 160 mg/dL or higher were randomly assigned to 6-month treatment with lovastatin (20 mg) or placebo. Assessments of neuropsychological performance, depression, hostility, and quality of life were conducted at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. Summary effect sizes were estimated as z scores on a standard deviation (SD) scale. RESULTS: Placebo-treated subjects improved between baseline and posttreatment periods on neuropsychological tests in all five performance domains, consistent with the effects of practice on test performance (all P <0.04), whereas chose treated with lovastatin improved only on tests of memory recall (P = 0.03). Comparisons of the changes in performance between placebo- and lovastatin-treated subjects revealed small, but statistically significant, differences for tests of attention (z score = 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06 to 0.31: P = 0.005) and psychomotor speed (z score = 0.17; 95% Ci, 0.05 to 0.28; P = 0.004) that were consistent with greater improvement in the placebo group. Psychological well-being, as measured several ways, was not affected by lovastatin. CONCLUSION: Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with lovastatin did not cause psychological distress or substantially alter cognitive function. Treatment did result in small performance decrements on neuropsychological tests of attention and psychomotor speed, the clinical importance of which is uncertain. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 546
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detraining effects on psychological well-being and stress reactivity
    de Geus, Eco J. C.
    de Vries, Marije
    Kreft, Jeroen
    Goedhart, Annebet
    Bakker, Frank
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 : S8 - S8
  • [32] PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND MARITAL DISSOLUTION - SELECTION EFFECTS
    MASTEKAASA, A
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 1994, 15 (02) : 208 - 228
  • [33] Surgical menopause: effects on psychological well-being and sexuality
    Shifren, Jan L.
    Avis, Nancy E.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2007, 14 (03): : 586 - 591
  • [34] THE EFFECTS OF OFFSPRING ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF OLDER ADULTS
    GLENN, ND
    MCLANAHAN, S
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1981, 43 (02): : 409 - 421
  • [35] Psychological well-being in elderly
    Naumova, Valentina
    Glozman, Janna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 44 - 44
  • [36] Sleep and psychological well-being
    Hamilton, N. A.
    Nelson, C. A.
    Stevens, N.
    Kitzman, Heather
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2007, 82 (01) : 147 - 163
  • [37] Technology and Psychological Well-Being
    Butter, Fidelma
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2010, 23 (03) : 214 - 214
  • [38] Psychological Capital and Well-being
    Youssef-Morgan, Carolyn M.
    Luthans, Fred
    STRESS AND HEALTH, 2015, 31 (03) : 180 - 188
  • [39] PARENTHOOD AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
    MCLANAHAN, S
    ADAMS, J
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1987, 13 : 237 - 257
  • [40] Exercise and psychological well-being
    Schulz, K. -H.
    Meyer, A.
    Langguth, N.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2012, 55 (01) : 55 - 65