Clinical outcomes of rectangular tunnel technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were comparable to the results of conventional round tunnel technique

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Seong Hwan [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Woo-Sung [2 ]
Kim, Boo-Seop [2 ]
Ok, Hyun-Soo [2 ]
Kim, Jong-Heon [2 ]
Lee, Jeuk [1 ]
Jung, Young-Bok [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 102 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06973, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Hyundae Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Namyangju Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Posterior cruciate ligament; Rectangular dilator; Remnant preservation; PCL reconstruction; POSTEROLATERAL CORNER RECONSTRUCTION; SINGLE-BUNDLE; ROTATORY INSTABILITY; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; FEMORAL FOOTPRINT; KNEE EVALUATION; INJURIES; ANATOMY; PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-020-06381-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To compare clinical outcomes between the conventional round and rectangular tunnel techniques in single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Methods Twenty-seven and 108 patients who underwent PCL reconstructions using a rectangular dilator (Group 1) and rounded tunnel reamer (Group 2), respectively, were included. The exclusion criteria were having a concomitant fracture, osteotomy, subtotal or total meniscectomy, and no remnant PCL tissue. A 4:1 propensity score matching was performed. The knee laxity on stress radiography, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation score, Tegner activity score and Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie score were evaluated. Results No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical scores. (n.s.) The mean posterior translations were also not significantly different between the Group 1 and 2 (3.6 +/- 2.8 and 3.8. +/- 3.1 mm, respectively; n.s.). However, 3 patients (11.1%) in Group 1 and 15 patients (13.8%) in Group 2 showed posterior translation of > 5 mm. The combined posterolateral corner sling technique was performed for 27 patients (100%) in Group 1 and for 96 patients (88.9%) in Group 2. We found no significant difference in rotational stability at the final follow-up. One patient was found to have a femoral condyle fracture during rectangular femoral tunnel establishment, which was healed after screw fixation, without laxity, during follow-up. The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the radiological measurements ranged from 0.81 to 0.89. Conclusion Arthroscopic anatomical remnant-preserving PCL reconstruction using a rectangular dilator showed satisfactory clinical results and stability as compared with PCL reconstruction using a conventional rounded reamer. Rectangular tunnel technique in PCL reconstruction could be a good treatment option with theoretical advantage to be anatomic.
引用
收藏
页码:3724 / 3734
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic Transtibial Tunnel Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Fanelli, Gregory C.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 23 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [22] Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one- vs. two-tunnel technique
    Houe, T
    Jorgensen, U
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2004, 14 (02) : 107 - 111
  • [23] Computed tomography value and tunnel enlargement of round and rounded rectangular femoral bone tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Takata, Yasushi
    Nakase, Junsuke
    Numata, Hitoaki
    Oshima, Takeshi
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (11) : 1587 - 1594
  • [24] Computed tomography value and tunnel enlargement of round and rounded rectangular femoral bone tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yasushi Takata
    Junsuke Nakase
    Hitoaki Numata
    Takeshi Oshima
    Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016, 136 : 1587 - 1594
  • [25] Early Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Full Tibial tunnel technique compared to all-inside technique
    Russu, Octav Marius
    Ciorcila, Emilian
    Feier, Andrei Marian
    Fleaca, Radu
    Zuh, Sandor Gyorgy
    Ioanovici, Andrei Constantin
    Gergely, Istvan
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2018, 69 (12): : 3753 - 3755
  • [26] Comparison of the Clinical Results of Three Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques Surgical Technique
    Kim, Sung-Jae
    Kim, Sung-Hwan
    Kim, Sul-Gee
    Kung, Yun-Pei
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A : 145 - 157
  • [27] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Transtibial technique
    Larson, RV
    Metcalf, MH
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 1999, 7 (04): : 253 - 265
  • [28] Conventional trans-tibial versus anatomic medial portal technique for femoral tunnel preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; comparison of clinical outcomes
    Zehir, S.
    Sahin, E.
    Songur, M.
    Kalem, M.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 19 (04) : 475 - 479
  • [29] Tibial Onlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Results
    Salim, Rodrigo
    do Nascimento, Felipe Marques
    Ferreira, Aline Miranda
    Lemos de Oliveira, Luciano Fonseca
    Fogagnolo, Fabricio
    Kfuri, Mauricio
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (03) : 284 - 290
  • [30] Single Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Results
    Van Tongel, Alexander
    MacDonald, Peter B.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2010, 18 (04): : 238 - 241