Clinical outcomes of rectangular tunnel technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were comparable to the results of conventional round tunnel technique

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Seong Hwan [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Woo-Sung [2 ]
Kim, Boo-Seop [2 ]
Ok, Hyun-Soo [2 ]
Kim, Jong-Heon [2 ]
Lee, Jeuk [1 ]
Jung, Young-Bok [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 102 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06973, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Hyundae Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Namyangju Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Posterior cruciate ligament; Rectangular dilator; Remnant preservation; PCL reconstruction; POSTEROLATERAL CORNER RECONSTRUCTION; SINGLE-BUNDLE; ROTATORY INSTABILITY; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; FEMORAL FOOTPRINT; KNEE EVALUATION; INJURIES; ANATOMY; PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-020-06381-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To compare clinical outcomes between the conventional round and rectangular tunnel techniques in single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Methods Twenty-seven and 108 patients who underwent PCL reconstructions using a rectangular dilator (Group 1) and rounded tunnel reamer (Group 2), respectively, were included. The exclusion criteria were having a concomitant fracture, osteotomy, subtotal or total meniscectomy, and no remnant PCL tissue. A 4:1 propensity score matching was performed. The knee laxity on stress radiography, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation score, Tegner activity score and Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie score were evaluated. Results No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical scores. (n.s.) The mean posterior translations were also not significantly different between the Group 1 and 2 (3.6 +/- 2.8 and 3.8. +/- 3.1 mm, respectively; n.s.). However, 3 patients (11.1%) in Group 1 and 15 patients (13.8%) in Group 2 showed posterior translation of > 5 mm. The combined posterolateral corner sling technique was performed for 27 patients (100%) in Group 1 and for 96 patients (88.9%) in Group 2. We found no significant difference in rotational stability at the final follow-up. One patient was found to have a femoral condyle fracture during rectangular femoral tunnel establishment, which was healed after screw fixation, without laxity, during follow-up. The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the radiological measurements ranged from 0.81 to 0.89. Conclusion Arthroscopic anatomical remnant-preserving PCL reconstruction using a rectangular dilator showed satisfactory clinical results and stability as compared with PCL reconstruction using a conventional rounded reamer. Rectangular tunnel technique in PCL reconstruction could be a good treatment option with theoretical advantage to be anatomic.
引用
收藏
页码:3724 / 3734
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcomes of rectangular tunnel technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were comparable to the results of conventional round tunnel technique
    Seong Hwan Kim
    Woo-Sung Kim
    Boo-Seop Kim
    Hyun-Soo Ok
    Jong-Heon Kim
    Jeuk Lee
    Young-Bok Jung
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 3724 - 3734
  • [2] Double tunnel technique for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament
    Clancy, WG
    Bisson, LJ
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 7 (03) : 110 - 117
  • [3] Antegrade Tibial Tunnel Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Sherlock, Matthew F. W.
    Otto, David
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (11): : 1301 - 1305
  • [4] Oval femoral tunnel technique is superior to the conventional round femoral tunnel technique using the hamstring tendon in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wen, Zhenxing
    Zhang, Hua
    Yan, Wenlong
    Mohamed, Sheikh Ibrahimrashid
    Zhao, Pei
    Huang, Xiao
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhou, Aiguo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (07) : 2245 - 2254
  • [5] Oval femoral tunnel technique is superior to the conventional round femoral tunnel technique using the hamstring tendon in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Zhenxing Wen
    Hua Zhang
    Wenlong Yan
    Sheikh Ibrahimrashid Mohamed
    Pei Zhao
    Xiao Huang
    Jian Zhang
    Aiguo Zhou
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020, 28 : 2245 - 2254
  • [6] Comparable Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between an Anatomic Tunnel and a Low Tibial Tunnel in Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Kim, Jung-Suk
    Park, Jae-Young
    Park, Soo Yeon
    Kiat, Raymond Yeak Dieu
    Kim, Sang-Gyun
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (02)
  • [7] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using allograft single tunnel technique - Single tunnel technique
    Yerys, Paul
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2007, 15 (04): : 191 - 198
  • [8] Posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and evaluation of safety and tunnel position
    Eduard Alentorn-Geli
    Joseph J. Stuart
    J. H. James Choi
    Alison P. Toth
    Claude T. Moorman
    Dean C. Taylor
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 2474 - 2480
  • [9] Posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and evaluation of safety and tunnel position
    Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
    Stuart, Joseph J.
    Choi, J. H. James
    Toth, Alison P.
    Moorman, Claude T., III
    Taylor, Dean C.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (08) : 2474 - 2480
  • [10] Anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides excellent clinical outcomes
    Tomohiko Matsuo
    Masashi Kusano
    Ryohei Uchida
    Takayuki Tsuda
    Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 1396 - 1403