Understanding what matters to patients in critical care: An exploratory evaluation

被引:6
|
作者
Connelly, Christine [1 ]
Jarvie, Lyndsey [1 ]
Daniel, Malcolm [1 ]
Monachello, Emma [1 ]
Quasim, Tara [1 ,2 ]
Dunn, Lelia [1 ]
McPeake, Joanne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow Royal Infirm, Crit Care, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Med Dent & Nursing, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
adult intensive care; family-centred care; quality improvement; person-centred nursing; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ICU; UNIT; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.12461
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background The delivery of person-centred care is a key priority for managers, policy makers, and clinicians in health care. The delivery person-centred care in critical care is challenging because of competing demands. Aims and objectives The aim of this quality improvement project was to understand what mattered to patients on a daily basis within the critical care environment. It aimed to understand personal goals and what patients needed to improve their experience. This paper reports on the outputs from this quality improvement project. Design and Data Analysis During each daily ward round, patients were asked "what matters to you today?" Outputs from this were entered into the Daily Goals Sheet, which is utilized for every patient in our critical care unit or in the nursing notes. Using Framework Analysis, prevalent themes were extracted from the patient statements documented. Results A total of 196 unique patients were included in this analysis alongside 592 patient statements. Four broad themes were generated: medical outcomes and information, the critical care environment, personal care, and family and caregivers. Conclusion The analysis of the data from this quality improvement project has demonstrated that, by asking a simple question within the context of a ward round, care can be enhanced and personalized and long-term outcomes potentially improved. More research is required to understand what the optimal methods are of implementing these requests. Relevance to clinical practice Two main recommendations from practice emerged from this quality improvement project: asking patients "what matters to you?" on a daily basis may help support the humanization of the critical care environment, and visiting and access by families must be discussed with patients to ensure this is appropriate for their needs.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 220
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Hospital-based spiritual care: what matters to patients?
    Advocat, Jenny
    Vasi, Shiva
    Karimi, Leila
    Glenister, David
    La, Cuong
    Holmes, Cheryl
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE CHAPLAINCY, 2023, 29 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [12] What matters to patients when their care is delegated to dental therapists?
    T. A. Dyer
    J. Owens
    P. G. Robinson
    British Dental Journal, 2013, 214 : E17 - E17
  • [13] Capturing what matters to patients when they evaluate their hospital care
    Fitzpatrick, R
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04): : 306 - 306
  • [14] Development of a care guidance index based on what matters to patients
    Wasson, John H.
    Soloway, Laura
    Moore, L. Gordon
    Labrec, Paul
    Ho, Lynn
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [15] Development of a care guidance index based on what matters to patients
    John H. Wasson
    Laura Soloway
    L. Gordon Moore
    Paul Labrec
    Lynn Ho
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 51 - 58
  • [16] Integrating what matters to patients in the care of older adults with cancer
    Murphy, Jane
    Battisti, Nicolo Matteo Luca
    LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY, 2022, 3 (09): : E577 - E578
  • [17] What matters to patients matters to me
    Arabi, Maryam
    HEART VIEWS, 2020, 21 (04): : 317 - 317
  • [18] Correction to: Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design
    Eva S. van den Ende
    Bo Schouten
    Marjolein N. T. Kremers
    Tim Cooksley
    Chris P. Subbe
    Immo Weichert
    Louise S. van Galen
    Harm R. Haak
    John Kellett
    Jelmer Alsma
    Victoria Siegrist
    Mark Holland
    Erika F. Christensen
    Colin A. Graham
    Ling Yan LEUNG
    Line E. Laugesen
    Hanneke Merten
    Fraz Mir
    Rachel M. Kidney
    Mikkel Brabrand
    Prabath W. B. Nanayakkara
    Christian H. Nickel
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [19] Agreement Matters: Critical Notice of Derek Parfit, On What Matters
    Darwall, Stephen
    PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2014, 123 (01): : 79 - 105
  • [20] Recent advances in understanding pain: what lies ahead for critical care?
    de Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 19 (03) : 110 - 113