Impact of prescribed fire and other factors on cheatgrass persistence in a Sierra Nevada ponderosa pine forest

被引:59
|
作者
Keeley, Jon E.
McGinnis, Thomas W.
机构
[1] USGS Western Ecol Res Ctr, Sequoia & Kings Canyon Field Stn, Three Rivers, CA 93271 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
aliens; Bromus tectorum; Downy brome; fire intensity; non-native; structural equation modelling;
D O I
10.1071/WF06052
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Following the reintroduction of fire Bromus tectorum has invaded the low elevation ponderosa pine forests in parts of Kings Canyon National Park, California. We used prescribed burns, other field manipulations, germination studies, and structural equation modelling, to investigate how fire and other factors affect the persistence of cheatgrass in these forests. Our studies show that altering burning season to coincide with seed maturation is not likely to control cheatgrass because sparse fuel loads generate low fire intensity. Increasing time between prescribed fires may inhibit cheatgrass by increasing surface fuels ( both herbaceous and litter), which directly inhibit cheatgrass establishment, and by creating higher intensity fires capable of killing a much greater fraction of the seed bank. Using structural equation modelling, postfire cheatgrass dominance was shown to be most strongly controlled by the prefire cheatgrass seedbank; other factors include soil moisture, fire intensity, soil N, and duration of direct sunlight. Current fire management goals in western conifer forests are focused on restoring historical fire regimes; however, these frequent fire regimes may enhance alien plant invasion in some forest types. Where feasible, fire managers should consider the option of an appropriate compromise between reducing serious fire hazards and exacerbating alien plant invasions.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 106
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prescribed fire regimes subtly alter ponderosa pine forest plant community structure
    Kerns, Becky K.
    Day, Michelle A.
    ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (12):
  • [12] Strategies for preventing invasive plant outbreaks after prescribed fire in ponderosa pine forest
    Symstad, Amy J.
    Newton, Wesley E.
    Swanson, Daniel J.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 324 : 81 - 88
  • [13] THE ALTITUDINAL REPLACEMENT OF DIGGER PINE BY PONDEROSA PINE ON THE WESTERN SLOPES OF THE SIERRA-NEVADA
    YEATON, RI
    YEATON, RW
    HORENSTEIN, JE
    BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB, 1980, 107 (04): : 487 - 495
  • [14] Prescribed fire impact on the stability of superficial draining in a pine forest
    Urrutia Hernandez, Isyoel
    Rodriguez Alfaro, Beatriz
    Gonzalez Menendez, Modesto
    Martinez Becerra, Luis Wilfredo
    Flores Gamica, Jose German
    Alonso Torrens, Yatsunaris
    MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2020, 26 (02):
  • [15] Responses of Fendler ceanothus to overstory thinning, prescribed fire, and drought in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest
    Huffman, DW
    Moore, MM
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 198 (1-3) : 105 - 115
  • [16] Forest Resistance to Extended Drought Enhanced by Prescribed Fire in Low Elevation Forests of the Sierra Nevada
    van Mantgem, Phillip J.
    Caprio, Anthony C.
    Stephenson, Nathan L.
    Das, Adrian J.
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (09):
  • [17] Historical and current landscape-scale ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forest structure in the Southern Sierra Nevada
    Stephens, Scott L.
    Lydersen, Jamie M.
    Collins, Brandon M.
    Fry, Danny L.
    Meyer, Marc D.
    ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (05):
  • [18] Fall rates of prescribed fire-killed ponderosa pine
    Harrington, MG
    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION RESEARCH PAPER, 1996, (489): : 1 - &
  • [19] Ecosystem respiration in a young ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California
    Xu, M
    DeBiase, TA
    Qi, Y
    Goldstein, A
    Liu, ZG
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (05) : 309 - 318
  • [20] PERSISTENCE OF LODGEPOLE PINE FORESTS IN THE CENTRAL SIERRA-NEVADA
    PARKER, AJ
    ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (06) : 1560 - 1567