Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries

被引:201
|
作者
Demetriades, Demetrios [1 ]
Hadjizacharia, Pantelis [1 ]
Constantinou, Costas [1 ]
Brown, Carlos [1 ]
Inaba, Kenji [1 ]
Rhee, Peter [1 ]
Salim, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Surg Intens Care, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. Background: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. Patients and Methods: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. Results: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4% and stab wounds for 29.6% of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9%) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1%) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3% of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a "blush" on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0%), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4% of all liver, 14.9% of kidney, and 3.5% of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. Conclusions: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 628
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recombinant factor VIIa as an adjunct in nonoperative management of solid organ injuries in children
    Vick, Laura R.
    Islam, Saleem
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2008, 43 (01) : 195 - 199
  • [22] Nonoperative management of solid organ injuries in children results in decreased blood utilization
    Partrick, DA
    Bensard, DD
    Moore, EE
    Karrer, FM
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1999, 34 (11) : 1695 - 1699
  • [23] NONOPERATIVE VS OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF PENETRATING RENAL INJURIES
    Moolman, Conray
    Navsaria, Pradeep
    Lazarus, John
    Pontin, Alan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E85 - E85
  • [24] Nonoperative Management of Penetrating Kidney Injuries: A Prospective Audit
    Moolman, C.
    Navsaria, P. H.
    Lazarus, J.
    Pontin, A.
    Nicol, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (01): : 169 - 173
  • [25] NONOPERATIVE VS OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF PENETRATING RENAL INJURIES
    Moolman, C.
    Navsaria, P.
    Lazarus, J.
    Pontin, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 75 - 75
  • [26] Selective nonoperative management of penetrating thoracic injury
    Van Waes, Oscar J. F.
    Halm, Jens A.
    Van Imhoff, Diederik I.
    Navsaria, Pradeep H.
    Nicol, Andrew J.
    Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
    Vermeulen, Jefrey
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [27] SELECTIVE CONSERVATISM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PENETRATING ABDOMINAL BULL-GORE INJURIES
    CHRISTIAN, F
    ROBINSON, RL
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1993, 24 (05): : 337 - 338
  • [28] Penetrating abdominal injuries: management controversies
    Muhammad U Butt
    Nikolaos Zacharias
    George C Velmahos
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 17
  • [29] Nonoperative management of abdominal solid-organ injuries following blunt trauma in adults: Results from an International Consensus Conference
    Cimbanassi, Stefania
    Chiara, Osvaldo
    Leppaniemi, Ari
    Henry, Sharon
    Scalea, Thomas M.
    Shanmuganathan, Kathirkamanathan
    Biffl, Walter
    Catena, Fausto
    Ansaloni, Luca
    Tugnoli, Gregorio
    De Blasio, Elvio
    Chieregato, Arturo
    Gordini, Giovanni
    Ribaldi, Sergio
    Castriconi, Maurizio
    Festa, Patrizio
    Coccolini, Federico
    di Saverio, Salomone
    Galfano, Antonio
    Massi, Massimo
    Celano, Marilena
    Mutignani, Massimiliano
    Rausei, Stefano
    Pantalone, Desiree
    Rampoldi, Antonio
    Fattori, Luca
    Miniello, Stefano
    Sgardello, Sebastian
    Bindi, Francesca
    Renzi, Federica
    Sammartano, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2018, 84 (03): : 517 - 531
  • [30] Penetrating abdominal injuries: management controversies
    Butt, Muhammad U.
    Zacharias, Nikolaos
    Velmahos, George C.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 17