Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of base of skull meningiomas: A preliminary comparison in the delineation of the gross tumor volume between four medical specialities

被引:2
|
作者
Mitine, C. [1 ]
Gilbeau, L. [1 ]
Dessya, F. [1 ]
Rooijackkers, H. [1 ]
Pirson, C. [1 ]
Rosier, J. [1 ]
Hoornaert, M. [1 ]
Harzee, L. [1 ]
Doneux, A. [1 ]
Beauduin, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jolimont Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Haine St Paul, Belgium
来源
Radiosurgery, Vol 6 | 2006年 / 6卷
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000093726
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the interobserver variability of base of skull meningiomas delineation on computed tomography. Methods and Materials: A group of eight physicians working in the same institution (two neurosurgeons, two neuroradiologists, two radiation oncologists and two medical oncologists) were asked to delineate the gross tumor volume of two patients on sequential CT slices. The same clinical information is provided to each observer. The results of the delineation by the four specialties are compared to each other. The mean of the volumes delineated by all observers are calculated. To determine the variation in the anatomical position of the target volume, a 3D comparison between an arbitrary point determined in the tumor and the most distant point of the tumor in the three directions is realized. For the interobserver variability, the coefficient of variance is used. Results: Large differences are observed between the eight physicians both for the estimation of the tumor volume and its anatomical position. The value of the ratio of the largest to the smallest volumes is 8.8 for the first patient and 3.3 for the second. Those ratios become 1. 19 and 1.66 for the medical oncologists, 1.07-1.57 for the neuroradiologists, 1.07-1.08 for the neurosurgeons and 1.14-6.5 for the radiation oncologists. The intersecting volume (on which all physicians agree) represents only 32% for the first patient and 34% for the second. Compared to radiation oncologists and medical oncologists, neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists delineate slightly smaller volumes. The results for the radiation group need to be taken cautiously because of the large delineation of one of the two observers. The lowest coefficient of variations, indicator of a smallest interobserver variation, are found for the group of neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists. Conclusions: The first step of 3D treatment planning, the delineation of base of skull meningiomas tumor is crucial. A good co-operation within a multidisciplinary team is mandatory. Different imaging modalities such as NMR and methionine PET are used. Difference between radiation oncologists and other specialties could be unconscious integration of geometrical uncertainties relevant in radiotherapy as the set-up variation, organ motion. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Lung With Tri-60Co Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy System (ViewRay): A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Target Delineation
    Wee, Chan Woo
    An, Hyun Joon
    Kang, Hyun-Cheol
    Kim, Hak Jae
    Wu, Hong-Gyun
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 : 1 - 7
  • [32] Re-irradiation of recurrent high grade gliomas using amino-acids-PET(SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy
    Grosu, AL
    Nieder, C
    Weber, W
    Franz, M
    Staerk, S
    Schwaiger, M
    Molls, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S222 - S222
  • [33] Significant correlation between gross tumor volume (GTV) D98% and local control in multifraction stereotactic radiotherapy (MF-SRT) for unresected brain metastases
    Dupic, Guillaume
    Brun, Lucie
    Molnar, Ioana
    Leyrat, Brice
    Chassin, Vincent
    Moreau, Juliette
    Dedieu, Veronique
    Khalil, Toufic
    Verrelle, Pierre
    Lapeyre, Michel
    Biau, Julian
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : 260 - 268
  • [34] Comparison of Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on free breathing CT, 4DCT and CBCT images of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Jiang, Runqing
    Xu, Lu
    Osei, Ernest
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (11) : 5385 - 5386
  • [35] Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Acoustic Neurinomas According to 3-D Tumor Volume Shrinkage and Quality of LifeVergleich zwischen stereotaktischer Radiochirurgie und stereotaktisch-fraktionierter Radiotherapie von Akustikusneurinomen hinsichtlich 3-D-Tumorvolumenregression und Lebensqualität
    Martin Henzel
    Klaus Hamm
    Helmut Sitter
    Markus W. Gross
    Gunnar Surber
    Gabriele Kleinert
    Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2009, 185 (9) : 567 - 573
  • [36] CBCT-based internal gross tumor volume definition for radiotherapy of of non-small-cell lung cancer: Comparison with target volumes based on three-dimensional CT and four-dimensional CT
    Li, F.
    Li, J.
    Shao, Q.
    Zhang, Y.
    Fan, T.
    Xu, M.
    Qi, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S220 - S220
  • [37] Dosimetric comparison of four-dimensional computed tomography based internal target volume against variations in respiratory motion during treatment between volumetric modulated arc therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Daimu Fujimoto
    Jun Takatsu
    Naoya Hara
    Masaki Oshima
    Jun Tomihara
    Eisuke Segawa
    Tatsuya Inoue
    Naoto Shikama
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2024, 17 : 143 - 152
  • [38] Dosimetric comparison of four-dimensional computed tomography based internal target volume against variations in respiratory motion during treatment between volumetric modulated arc therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Fujimoto, Daimu
    Takatsu, Jun
    Hara, Naoya
    Oshima, Masaki
    Tomihara, Jun
    Segawa, Eisuke
    Inoue, Tatsuya
    Shikama, Naoto
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (01) : 143 - 152