Dynamic Pricing for Impatient Bidders

被引:9
|
作者
Bansal, Nikhil [1 ]
Chen, Ning [2 ]
Cherniavsky, Neva [3 ]
Rurda, Atri [4 ]
Schieber, Baruch [1 ]
Sviridenko, Maxim [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Corp, Thomas J Watson Res Ctr, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Div Math Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
Algorithms; Theory; Digital goods; online algorithms; pricing; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1145/1721837.1721851
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We study the following problem related to pricing over time. Assume there is a collection of bidders, each of whom is interested in buying a copy of an item of which there is an unlimited supply. Every bidder is associated with a time interval over which the bidder will consider buying a copy of the item, and a maximum value the bidder is willing to pay for the item. On every time unit, the seller sets a price for the item. The seller's goal is to set the prices so as to maximize revenue from the sale of copies of items over the time period. In the first model considered, we assume that all bidders are impatient, that is, bidders buy the item at the first time unit within their bid interval that they can afford the price. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that considers this model. In the offline setting, we assume that the seller knows the bids of all the bidders in advance. In the online setting we assume that at each time unit the seller only knows the values of the bids that have arrived before or at that time unit. We give a polynomial time offline algorithm and prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic and randomized online algorithms, compared with the optimal offline solution. The gap between the upper and lower bounds is quadratic. We also consider the envy-free model in which bidders are sold the item at the minimum price during their bid interval, as long as it is not over their limit value. We prove tight bounds on the competitiveness of deterministic online algorithms for this model, and upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms with quadratic gap. The lower bounds for the randomized case in both models use a novel general technique.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMPATIENT
    Frio, B.
    NOVYI MIR, 2015, (02): : 139 - 146
  • [22] Impatient
    Simota, Maria
    STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI PHILOLOGIA, 2021, 66 (04): : 399 - 400
  • [23] DYNAMIC RAMSEY PRICING
    BROCK, WA
    DECHERT, WD
    INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1985, 26 (03) : 569 - 591
  • [24] Dynamic pricing via dynamic programming
    Fan, YY
    Bhargava, HK
    Natsuyama, HH
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 127 (03) : 565 - 577
  • [25] Transient Analysis for a Queuing System with Impatient Customers and Its Applications to the Pricing Strategy of a Video Website
    Bu, Qihui
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (13)
  • [26] Assortment Optimization and Pricing Under the Multinomial Logit Model with Impatient Customers: Sequential Recommendation and Selection
    Gao, Pin
    Ma, Yuhang
    Chen, Ningyuan
    Gallego, Guillermo
    Li, Anran
    Rusmevichientong, Paat
    Topaloglu, Huseyin
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 69 (05) : 1509 - 1532
  • [27] Dynamic Pricing of Electricity
    Joskow, Paul L.
    Wolfram, Catherine D.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03): : 381 - 385
  • [28] Multimodal Dynamic Pricing
    Wang, Yining
    Chen, Boxiao
    Simchi-Levi, David
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (10) : 6136 - 6152
  • [29] Dynamic Allocation and Pricing
    Board, Simon
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2015, 94 : 222 - 223
  • [30] Dynamic Taxi Pricing
    Zeng, Cheng
    Oren, Nir
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 1135 - 1136