The effect of training and experience on the magnetic resonance imaging interpretation of meniscal tears

To evaluate the effects of experience and training in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of meniscal tears 30 consecutive patients (60 menisci) in whom MRI of the knee with arthroscopic confirmation of meniscal status were studied. MRIs were interpreted by 10 reviewers of varying levels of training and experience ranging from first-year radiology residents to attending musculoskeletal radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity, and intraobserver variability of MRI interpretation of meniscal tears were calculated for each reviewer and compared to those of readers of the same and varying levels of MRI training and experience. Accuracy (range, 78% to 88%), sensitivity (range, 79% to 88%), and specificity (range, 72% to 94%) results were high, and intraobserver agreement was moderate to high (range, 0.49 to 0.77), in the diagnosis of meniscal tears for all reviewers with 4 or more years of radiology residency training and 3 months of formal MRI experience. In contrast, the accuracy (range, 63% to 82%), sensitivity (range, 58% to 79%), and specificity (range, 58% to 72%) results of reviewers with less experience and training were lower, with higher intraobserver variability, Our results suggest that experience and training play an important role in the accurate and reliable MRI diagnosis of meniscal tears.