Design Considerations for Cost-Effective Ozone Mass Transfer in Sidestream Systems

被引:10
|
作者
Rakness, Kerwin L. [1 ]
Hunter, Glenn [1 ]
Lew, Julia [2 ]
Mundy, Bill [3 ]
Wert, Eric C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Proc Applicat Inc, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Southern Nevada Water Author, Las Vegas, NV 89153 USA
[3] Reg Municipal Halton, Oakville, ON, Canada
关键词
Corrosion; Cost; Design; Energy; Operation; Ozone; Pressure; Pump; Remixing; Safety; Sidestream; Transfer Efficiency; Turndown;
D O I
10.1080/01919512.2018.1424532
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ozone dissolution system design is important for meeting transfer efficiency (TE) goals. Large sidestream pump flow (L) and high venturi inlet pressure improves TE but increases operating cost. Ozone TE was examined at a 25 gpm (97-Lpm) pilot-scale sidestream system with (SSw-dg) and without (SSwo-dg) degas separation. Under constant ozone dose conditions, process operating parameters were varied including sidestream gas/liquid (G/L) ratio, venturi-inlet water pressure, venturi-outlet water pressure, feed gas pressure, and ozone gas concentration. Performance results included determination of TE, ozone exposure (CTHDT), and hydraulic detention time (T-HDT). Several design aspects of sidestream ozone systems were examined to improve mass transfer by using remixing devices, protecting ozone gas piping from corrosion, calculating sidestream ozone residual, and driving force for mass transfer. Moisture contamination of ozone supply lines may cause corrosion and/or decomposition of ozone gas that releases heat and destroys ozone. Ozone gas piping design is critical to prevent trapping water that might enter gas pipe during power outage or when units are offline. During plant operation below design flow, multiple constant speed pumps or variable speed pumps were evaluated to reduce overall operating costs.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MAKING EVALUATION SYSTEMS COST-EFFECTIVE
    BARRETT, T
    DEHAAN, J
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1977, 28 (03): : 173 - &
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
    LUM, H
    HEER, E
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1991, 24 : 23 - 31
  • [33] Risk management considerations for cost-effective environmental decisionmaking
    Gonzalez, MA
    CHEMISTRY FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 2, 1996, 51 : 17 - 19
  • [34] Memory hierarchy considerations for cost-effective cluster computing
    Du, X
    Zhang, XD
    Zhu, ZC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2000, 49 (09) : 915 - 933
  • [35] Cost-effective Design of Magnetically Coupled Power Transfer System with Standby Mode
    Kim, Moon-Young
    Kang, Jeong-il
    Han, Jonghee
    45TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY (IECON 2019), 2019, : 5746 - 5751
  • [36] Is mass screening for breast cancer cost-effective?
    deKoning, HJ
    Coebergh, JWW
    vanDongen, JA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (11) : 1835 - 1839
  • [37] TRANSFER STATIONS PROVIDE COST-EFFECTIVE OPTION
    SMILEY, CH
    MANAGEMENT OF WORLD WASTES, 1984, 27 (03): : 22 - &
  • [38] Cost-Effective Transfer Learning for Data Streams
    Wu, Ocean
    Koh, Yun Sing
    Dobbie, Gillian
    Lacombe, Thomas
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2022, : 1233 - 1238
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVE DESIGN - A PRUDENT APPROACH TO THE DESIGN OF OPTICS
    PLUMMER, J
    LAGGER, W
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1982, 16 (12) : 65 - 68
  • [40] DESIGN OF COST-EFFECTIVE WASTE-REDUCTION SYSTEMS FOR SYNTHETIC FUEL PLANTS
    WARREN, A
    SRINIVAS, BK
    EL-HALWAGI, MM
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (10): : 742 - 746