Design Considerations for Cost-Effective Ozone Mass Transfer in Sidestream Systems

被引:10
|
作者
Rakness, Kerwin L. [1 ]
Hunter, Glenn [1 ]
Lew, Julia [2 ]
Mundy, Bill [3 ]
Wert, Eric C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Proc Applicat Inc, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Southern Nevada Water Author, Las Vegas, NV 89153 USA
[3] Reg Municipal Halton, Oakville, ON, Canada
关键词
Corrosion; Cost; Design; Energy; Operation; Ozone; Pressure; Pump; Remixing; Safety; Sidestream; Transfer Efficiency; Turndown;
D O I
10.1080/01919512.2018.1424532
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ozone dissolution system design is important for meeting transfer efficiency (TE) goals. Large sidestream pump flow (L) and high venturi inlet pressure improves TE but increases operating cost. Ozone TE was examined at a 25 gpm (97-Lpm) pilot-scale sidestream system with (SSw-dg) and without (SSwo-dg) degas separation. Under constant ozone dose conditions, process operating parameters were varied including sidestream gas/liquid (G/L) ratio, venturi-inlet water pressure, venturi-outlet water pressure, feed gas pressure, and ozone gas concentration. Performance results included determination of TE, ozone exposure (CTHDT), and hydraulic detention time (T-HDT). Several design aspects of sidestream ozone systems were examined to improve mass transfer by using remixing devices, protecting ozone gas piping from corrosion, calculating sidestream ozone residual, and driving force for mass transfer. Moisture contamination of ozone supply lines may cause corrosion and/or decomposition of ozone gas that releases heat and destroys ozone. Ozone gas piping design is critical to prevent trapping water that might enter gas pipe during power outage or when units are offline. During plant operation below design flow, multiple constant speed pumps or variable speed pumps were evaluated to reduce overall operating costs.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DESIGN EFFECTIVE COST-EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS
    LEE, CM
    WATER & WASTES ENGINEERING, 1978, 15 (07): : 66 - &
  • [2] Design considerations for cost-effective kraft and sulfite pulping liquor spill control systems
    Amendola, GA
    Vice, K
    McCubbin, N
    1996 TAPPI MINIMUM EFFLUENT MILLS SYMPOSIUM, 1996, : 45 - 63
  • [3] Optimal cost-effective design of complex systems
    Amari, SV
    Tenth ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design, Proceedings, 2004, : 320 - 324
  • [4] DESIGN OF COST-EFFECTIVE HIERARCHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS
    BROOKES, BC
    INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL, 1970, 6 (02): : 127 - &
  • [5] Conjunctive use of models to design cost-effective ozone control strategies
    Fu, Joshua S.
    Brill, E. Downey, III
    Ranjithan, S. Ranji
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (06) : 800 - 809
  • [6] National-Scale Optimized Design of Cost-Effective Water Supply and Transfer Systems
    Tomlinson, James
    Slaughter, Andrew
    Matrosov, Evgenii
    Wilson, Jonny
    Blackwell, Richard
    Dunford, Tracey
    Read, Margaret
    Dennis, Jonathan
    Harou, Julien J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 151 (01)
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS
    WATSON, WS
    ENGINEERING, 1982, 222 (06): : 415 - 416
  • [8] Selection and design of cost-effective risk reduction systems
    Antes, MK
    Miri, MF
    Flamberg, SA
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2001, 20 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVE FURNACE DESIGN
    ROBERTS, D
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1983, 62 (08): : 876 - 876
  • [10] A new framework for cost-effective design of Hybrid Power Systems
    Rozali, Nor Erniza Mohammad
    Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan
    Ho, Wai Shin
    Manan, Zainuddin Abdul
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Mustapha, Nur Nadiah
    Rosli, Muhammad Haiqal
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 806 - 815