A randomized controlled trial of an online immunization curriculum

被引:14
|
作者
Pahud, Barbara [1 ]
Williams, S. Elizabeth [2 ]
Lee, Brian R. [1 ]
Lewis, Kadriye O. [1 ]
Middleton, Donald B. [3 ]
Clark, Shannon [1 ]
Humiston, Sharon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Mercy Hosp, UMKC Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Dept Pediat, Div Gen Pediat, 2200 Childrens Way,8232 Doctors Off Tower, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, 815 Freeport Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15215 USA
关键词
Vaccine education; Medical education; Resident education; Vaccine hesitancy; Pediatric; Family medicine; UNITED-STATES RECOMMENDATIONS; AREA VACCINATION COVERAGE; AGED; 13-17; YEARS; COGNITIVE LOAD; HPV VACCINE; MULTIMEDIA; ATTITUDES; HESITANCY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.043
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Immunization education for physicians-in-training is crucial to address vaccine concerns in clinical practice. Vaccine education is not standardized across residency programs. The Collaboration for Vaccination Education and Research (CoVER) team developed an online curriculum for pediatric (Peds) and family medicine (FM) residents. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed during the 2017-2018 academic year to evaluate the CoVER curriculum. A convenience sample of residency institutions were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group, with stratification by residency type. The intervention, the CoVER curriculum, consisted of four online modules and an in-person training guide. Control sites continued with their standard vaccine education. Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys were emailed to residents in both groups. The primary outcomes compared between groups were changes in "vaccine knowledge," "vaccine attitudes/hesitancy," and "self-confidence" in immunization communication. The team assessing outcomes was unblinded to assignments. Hierarchical general linear model was used to adjust for residency type and residency year; residency site was modeled as a random effect. Results: Overall, 1444 residents from 31 residency programs were eligible to participate (734 intervention, 710 control). The pre-intervention response rate was 730 (51%) and post-intervention was 526 (36%). Average knowledge scores increased from pre-intervention (control 53%; CoVER 53%) to post-intervention (control 58%; CoVER 60%). Increases in vaccine knowledge among FM residents were greater for CoVER compared to controls (p = 0.041). Vaccine hesitancy was more common among FM (23%) than Peds (10%) residents. In all three residency years, residents in the CoVER group showed greater increases in self-confidence in ability to discuss vaccines with parents/patients (p < 0.03) compared to control group. Conclusion: The CoVER curriculum is an effective model to standardize immunization education of physicians-in-training. This RCT demonstrated the effectiveness of the CoVER curriculum to improve resident confidence in their ability to discuss vaccines with parents and patients. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7299 / 7307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immunization education for internal medicine residents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Whitaker, Jennifer A.
    Poland, Caroline M.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Bundrick, John B.
    Chaudhry, Rajeev
    Grill, Diane E.
    Halvorsen, Andrew J.
    Huber, Jill M.
    Kasten, Mary J.
    Mauck, Karen F.
    Mehta, Ramila A.
    Olson, Timothy
    Thomas, Kris G.
    Thomas, Matthew R.
    Virk, Abinash
    Wingo, Majken T.
    Poland, Gregory A.
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (14) : 1823 - 1829
  • [22] Mailed reminders for area-wide influenza immunization: A randomized controlled trial
    Smith, DM
    Zhou, XH
    Weinberger, M
    Smith, F
    McDonald, RC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1999, 47 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [23] Effect of stepwise perinatal immunization education: A cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Saitoh, Aya
    Saitoh, Akihiko
    Sato, Isamu
    Shinozaki, Tomohiro
    Kamiya, Hajime
    Nagata, Satoko
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (12) : 1645 - 1651
  • [24] THE EFFECT OF SHOTBLOCKER ON IMMUNIZATION PAIN IN TERM NEONATES: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Caglar, S.
    Buyukyilmaz, F.
    Cosansu, G.
    Caglayan, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 175 (11) : 1445 - 1445
  • [25] Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
    Steinhoff, Mark C.
    Omer, Saad B.
    Roy, Eliza
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Raqib, Rubhana
    Dodd, Caitlin
    Breiman, Robert F.
    Zaman, K.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 184 (06) : 645 - 653
  • [26] A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Financial Literacy Curriculum for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
    Andrea Hetling
    Judy L. Postmus
    Cecilia Kaltz
    Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2016, 37 : 672 - 685
  • [27] Communication Skills Course in an Indian Undergraduate Dental Curriculum: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sangappa, Sunila B.
    Tekian, Ara
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2013, 77 (08) : 1092 - 1098
  • [28] Disclosure of Medical Errors in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Simulation Curriculum
    Barratt, Diana
    Shakir, Maryam
    Li, Yinghui
    Bonnin, Rodolfo
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [29] A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Financial Literacy Curriculum for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
    Hetling, Andrea
    Postmus, Judy L.
    Kaltz, Cecilia
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2016, 37 (04) : 672 - 685
  • [30] Randomized controlled trial to improve childhood immunization adherence in rural Pakistan: redesigned immunization card and maternal education
    Usman, Hussain R.
    Rahbar, Mohammad H.
    Kristensen, Sibylle
    Vermund, Sten H.
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Habib, Faiza
    Chamot, Eric
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2011, 16 (03) : 334 - 342