Trend Analysis of Primary Midwife-led Delivery Care at a Japanese Perinatal Center

被引:3
|
作者
Suzuki, Shunji [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo 1240012, Japan
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2014年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
Midwife-led care; obstetric shared care; referral; Japan; RISK PREGNANT-WOMEN; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LABOR; REFERRALS; MORTALITY; UNIT; HOME;
D O I
10.7150/ijms.8204
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To perform trend analysis of primary midwife-led delivery care for 'low risk' pregnant women at our hospital. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to examine trends and outcomes of labor under primary midwife-led delivery care at the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between 2008 and 2012. Results: During the study period, the rate of deliveries initially considered 'low risk' decreased from 25 to 22% (p < 0.01). This change was associated with increased cases of previous Cesarean deliveries and preterm delivery. There were no significant changes in the neonatal outcomes; however, the rate of Cesarean delivery and incidence of severe perineal laceration in primary midwife-led delivery care were decreased from 2.1 and 3.3% to 0.3 (p = 0.02) and 1.1% (p = 0.04), respectively due to the close cooperation between midwives and obstetricians. Conclusion: The rate of deliveries initially considered 'low risk' decreased over the last 5-year period. Closer cooperation between midwives and obstetricians is important in primary midwife-led delivery care.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 470
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perinatal and maternal outcomes in a midwife-led centre in italy: a comparison with standard hospital assistance
    Dante, Giulia
    Neri, Isabella
    Bruno, Raffaele
    Salvioli, Chiara
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2016, 68 (03): : 237 - 242
  • [32] An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led care in the United Kingdom
    Ryan, Padhraig
    Revill, Paul
    Devane, Declan
    Normand, Charles
    MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (04) : 368 - 376
  • [33] Midwife-Led Versus Obstetrician-Led Perinatal Care for Low-Risk Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies
    Sriram, Shyamkumar
    Almutairi, Fahad M.
    Albadrani, Muayad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (22)
  • [34] Midwives' readiness for midwife-led care: a mixed-methods study
    Kuipers, Yvonne J.
    Bosmans, Valerie
    Thaels, Ellen
    De Bock, Vanessa
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (06)
  • [35] Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: Choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy
    Butler, Michelle M.
    Sheehy, Lucille
    Kington, Mary
    Walsh, Maura C.
    Brosnan, Mary C.
    Murphy, Martina
    Naughton, Corina
    Drennan, Jonathan
    Barry, Theresa
    MIDWIFERY, 2015, 31 (04) : 418 - 425
  • [36] Women's satisfaction with midwife-led continuity of care: an observational study in Palestine
    Mortensen, Berit
    Diep, Lien M.
    Lukasse, Mirjam
    Lieng, Marit
    Dwekat, Ibtesam
    Elias, Dalia
    Fosse, Erik
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [37] Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
    Sandall, Jane
    Soltani, Hora
    Gates, Simon
    Shennan, Andrew
    Devane, Declan
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (08):
  • [38] WORKING ALONGSIDE A MIDWIFE-LED CARE UNIT - WHAT DO OBSTETRICIANS THINK
    CHEYNE, H
    TURNBULL, D
    LUNAN, CB
    REID, M
    GREER, IA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06): : 485 - 487
  • [39] A comparison of midwife-led care versus obstetrician-led care for low-risk women in Japan
    Iida, Mariko
    Horiuchi, Shigeko
    Nagamori, Kumiko
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2014, 27 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [40] Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
    Sandall, Jane
    Soltani, Hora
    Gates, Simon
    Shennan, Andrew
    Devane, Declan
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (09):