Control effort evaluation for low-altitude formation flying

被引:0
|
作者
Sabatini, Marco [1 ]
Palmerini, Giovanni B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Ingn Aerospaziale & Astronaut, Via Eudossiana,18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Formation flying faces an increasing interest as a mission concept offering reliability and performances improvements. However, orbital control effort required to maintain the desired configuration can result too expensive, and therefore its evaluation becomes a critical point in judging the feasibility of a mission. A correct estimate will depend on the closeness to the real environment of the dynamic model used to design the control. In such a perspective, this paper introduces the Carter-Humi modification to the classical Euler-Hill set of equations in order to take into account the effect of the atmospheric drag. Low altitude orbits can be therefore modeled in a far more accurate way than using Euler-Hill schemes, while a simple model structure (linearity of equations) is still held. Based on this set, an optimal controller has been codified on the basis of LQR approach, detailing all transformations needed to this aim. Two sample cases, i.e. a leader-follower formation and a circular projection formation in LEO, have been implemented as tests for the controller. Performances have been evaluated in the frame of a complete simulation including all remarkable perturbing effects. The advantage of the strategy computed on the Carter-Humi modified model is in the order of 10-15% of the control requirement with respect to classical Euler Hill case. In a more general view, the computation of the actuators' effort, obtained with a model closer to the real orbital envirornment, is deemed to be more meaningful than the cases already available in literature. Requirements derived in this way should therefore be quite useful while assessing mission feasibility. Interestingly, the same approach could be extended to other perturbations suitable to a meaningful linearization.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low-speed and Low-altitude UAS
    Devriendt, Lomme
    GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2014, 28 (01): : 23 - 25
  • [22] The Advantage by Using Low-Altitude UAV for Sustainable Urban Development Control
    Djimantoro, Michael I.
    Suhardjanto, Gatot
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECO ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 2017 (ICEED 2017), 2018, 109
  • [23] Optimal Guidance and Control of a Low-Altitude Skid-to-Turn Vehicle
    Dennis, Miriam E.
    Rao, Anil V.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2021, 58 (03) : 894 - 905
  • [24] Low-Altitude Measurements of the Neutron Background
    Mitchell, Lee J.
    Phlips, Bernard F.
    Wulf, Eric A.
    Hutcheson, Anthony L.
    Gwon, Chul
    Woolf, Richard S.
    Polaski, Donald
    2014 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2014,
  • [25] Low-altitude meteor trail echoes
    Malhotra, Akshay
    Mathews, John D.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
  • [26] RADAR TRACKING OF LOW-ALTITUDE TARGETS
    CALAMIA, M
    JIBERIO, R
    FRANLESCHETTI, G
    GIVLI, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1974, AE10 (04) : 539 - 544
  • [27] Optimal control of a low-altitude flight in the terrain-following mode
    Parshikov, A., V
    TRUDY INSTITUTA MATEMATIKI I MEKHANIKI URO RAN, 2020, 26 (02): : 225 - 237
  • [28] Improving Productivity of Low-Altitude Airspace: Speed vs Direction Control
    Bulusu, Vishwanath
    Sengupta, Raja
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (09) : 5904 - 5913
  • [29] NEW LOW-ALTITUDE DOSE MEASUREMENTS
    GUSSENHOVEN, MS
    MULLEN, EG
    FILZ, RC
    BRAUTIGAM, DH
    HANSER, FA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1987, 34 (03) : 676 - 683
  • [30] Source of the low-altitude hiss in the ionosphere
    Chen, Lunjin
    Santolik, Ondrej
    Hajos, Mychajlo
    Zheng, Liheng
    Zhima, Zeren
    Heelis, Roderick
    Hanzelka, Miroslav
    Horne, Richard B.
    Parrot, Michel
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (05) : 2060 - 2069