Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation

被引:16
|
作者
Vogel, Joshua P. [1 ]
Comrie-Thomson, Liz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pingray, Veronica [4 ]
Gadama, Luis [5 ]
Galadanci, Hadiza [6 ]
Goudar, Shivaprasad [7 ]
Laisser, Rose [8 ]
Lavender, Tina [9 ]
Lissauer, David [10 ,11 ]
Misra, Sujata [12 ]
Pujar, Yeshita [7 ]
Qureshi, Zahida P. [13 ]
Amole, Taiwo [6 ]
Berrueta, Mabel [4 ]
Dankishiya, Faisal [6 ]
Gwako, George [13 ]
Homer, Caroline S. E. [1 ]
Jobanputra, Jonathan [10 ]
Meja, Sam [14 ]
Nigri, Carolina [4 ]
Mohaptra, Vandana [12 ]
Osoti, Alfred [13 ]
Roberti, Javier [4 ]
Solomon, Dennis [15 ]
Suleiman, Maryam [16 ]
Robbers, Gianna [1 ]
Sutherland, Shireen [10 ]
Vernekar, Sunil [7 ]
Althabe, Fernando [17 ]
Bonet, Mercedes [17 ]
Oladapo, Olufemi T. [17 ]
机构
[1] Burnet Inst, Maternal Child & Adolescent Hlth Program, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS CONICE, Dept Mother & Child Hlth Res, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Univ Malawi, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Coll Med, Zomba, Malawi
[6] Bayero Univ, Africa Ctr Excellence Populat Hlth & Policy, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
[7] JN Med Coll, KLE Acad Higher Educ & Res, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
[8] Catholic Univ Hlth & Allied Hlth Sci, Archbishop Antony Mayala Sch Nursing, Mwanza, Tanzania
[9] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, Lancs, England
[10] Queen Elizabeth Cent Hosp, Coll Med, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Res Inst, Blantyre, Malawi
[11] Univ Liverpool, Inst Lifecourse & Med Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[12] Fakir Mohan Med Coll & Hosp, Balasore, Odisha, India
[13] Univ Nairobi, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nairobi, Kenya
[14] Queen Elizabeth Cent Hosp, Blantyre, Malawi
[15] Thyolo Dist Hosp, Thyolo, Malawi
[16] Muhammad Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hosp, Kano, Nigeria
[17] WHO, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA,UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programm, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2021年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
childbirth; intrapartum care; labor; partograph; WHO Labour Care Guide;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12511
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction The World Health Organization's (WHO) Labour Care Guide (LCG) is a "next-generation" partograph based on WHO's latest intrapartum care recommendations. It aims to optimize clinical care provided to women and their experience of care. We evaluated the LCG's usability, feasibility, and acceptability among maternity care practitioners in clinical settings. Methods Mixed-methods evaluation with doctors, midwives, and nurses in 12 health facilities across Argentina, India, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Purposively sampled and trained practitioners applied the LCG in low-risk women during labor and rated experiences, satisfaction, and usability. Practitioners were invited to focus group discussions (FGDs) to share experiences and perceptions of the LCG, which were subjected to framework analysis. Results One hundred and thirty-six practitioners applied the LCG in managing labor and birth of 1,226 low-risk women. The majority of women had a spontaneous vaginal birth (91.6%); two cases of intrapartum stillbirths (1.63 per 1000 births) occurred. Practitioner satisfaction with the LCG was high, and median usability score was 67.5%. Practitioners described the LCG as supporting precise and meticulous monitoring during labor, encouraging critical thinking in labor management, and improving the provision of woman-centered care. Conclusions The LCG is feasible and acceptable to use across different clinical settings and can promote woman-centered care, though some design improvements would benefit usability. Implementing the LCG needs to be accompanied by training and supportive supervision, and strategies to promote an enabling environment (including updated policies on supportive care interventions, and ensuring essential equipment is available).
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 75
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
    Fajardo, Emmanuel
    Watson, Victoria
    Kumwenda, Moses
    Usharidze, Dali
    Gogochashvili, Sophiko
    Kakhaberi, David
    Giguashvili, Ana
    Johnson, Cheryl C.
    Jamil, Muhammad S.
    Dacombe, Russell
    Stvilia, Ketevan
    Easterbrook, Philippa
    Reipold, Elena Ivanova
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
    Emmanuel Fajardo
    Victoria Watson
    Moses Kumwenda
    Dali Usharidze
    Sophiko Gogochashvili
    David Kakhaberi
    Ana Giguashvili
    Cheryl C. Johnson
    Muhammad S. Jamil
    Russell Dacombe
    Ketevan Stvilia
    Philippa Easterbrook
    Elena Ivanova Reipold
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
  • [43] Usability and feasibility assessment of a smartphone application (Suhriday) for heart failure self-care remote monitoring in an Indian tertiary health care setting: a pilot mixed-methods study
    Bylappa, Bhuvana Kolar
    Kamath, Deepak Y.
    Josephine, Immaculate Sheela
    Shaikh, Jabraan
    Kamath, Anant
    Rioniz, Preethi
    Kulkarni, Shruthi
    Varghese, Kiron
    Xavier, Denis
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [44] Mindfulness-based Wellness and Resilience intervention among interdisciplinary primary care teams: a mixed-methods feasibility and acceptability trial
    Colgan, Dana Dharmakaya
    Christopher, Michael
    Bowen, Sarah
    Brems, Christiane
    Hunsinger, Mathew
    Tucker, Brian
    Dapolonia, Eli
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 20 : e91
  • [45] Acceptability and feasibility of an online psychosocial intervention for Dutch adolescents with a visible difference: A mixed-methods study
    van Dalen, M.
    Pasmans, S. G. M. A.
    Aendekerk, E. W. C.
    Mathijssen, I. M. J.
    Koudstaal, M. J.
    Williamson, H.
    Hillegers, M. H. J.
    Utens, E. M. W. J.
    Okkerse, J. M. E.
    BODY IMAGE, 2022, 41 : 298 - 307
  • [46] Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of a GPT-Based Chatbot for Depression Screening: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Guo, Zhijun
    Lai, Alvina
    Deng, Zhouyiyi
    Li, Kezhi
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE, PT I, AIIH 2024, 2024, 14975 : 249 - 263
  • [47] Feasibility and Acceptability of Tele-Colposcopy on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua: A Descriptive Mixed-Methods Study
    Mitchell, Emma McKim
    Doede, Aubrey L.
    Estrada, Michelet McLean
    Granera, Orlando Benito
    Maldonado, Francisco
    Dunn, Brian
    Banks, Shernai
    Marks-Symeonides, Imani
    Morrone, Danielle
    Pitt, Charlotte
    Dillingham, Rebecca A.
    TELEMEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 2 (01): : 264 - 272
  • [48] Mixed-methods evaluation of a nurse-led allergy clinic model in primary care: Feasibility trial
    Hammersley, Vicky
    Kelman, Margaret
    Morrice, Lynn
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Mukerjhee, Mome
    Harley, Susan
    Schwarze, Jurgen
    Sheikh, Aziz
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [49] Usability and Feasibility Evaluation of a Web-Based and Offline Cybersecurity Resource for Health Care Organizations (The Essentials of Cybersecurity in Health Care Organizations Framework Resource): Mixed Methods Study
    O'Brien, Niki
    Crespo, Roberto Fernandez
    O'Driscoll, Fiona
    Prendergast, Mabel
    Chana, Deeph
    Darzi, Ara
    Ghafur, Saira
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [50] FEASIBILITY, ACCEPTABILITY, AND UTILITY OF THE HOME ALONE INTERVENTION: A PRELIMINARY MIXED METHODS EVALUATION
    Savard, Grace
    Birkeland, Robyn
    Ingvalson, Stephanie
    Pepin, Renee
    Cigliana, Jill
    Gitlin, Laura
    Gaugler, Joseph
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 : 1313 - 1313