Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation

被引:16
|
作者
Vogel, Joshua P. [1 ]
Comrie-Thomson, Liz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pingray, Veronica [4 ]
Gadama, Luis [5 ]
Galadanci, Hadiza [6 ]
Goudar, Shivaprasad [7 ]
Laisser, Rose [8 ]
Lavender, Tina [9 ]
Lissauer, David [10 ,11 ]
Misra, Sujata [12 ]
Pujar, Yeshita [7 ]
Qureshi, Zahida P. [13 ]
Amole, Taiwo [6 ]
Berrueta, Mabel [4 ]
Dankishiya, Faisal [6 ]
Gwako, George [13 ]
Homer, Caroline S. E. [1 ]
Jobanputra, Jonathan [10 ]
Meja, Sam [14 ]
Nigri, Carolina [4 ]
Mohaptra, Vandana [12 ]
Osoti, Alfred [13 ]
Roberti, Javier [4 ]
Solomon, Dennis [15 ]
Suleiman, Maryam [16 ]
Robbers, Gianna [1 ]
Sutherland, Shireen [10 ]
Vernekar, Sunil [7 ]
Althabe, Fernando [17 ]
Bonet, Mercedes [17 ]
Oladapo, Olufemi T. [17 ]
机构
[1] Burnet Inst, Maternal Child & Adolescent Hlth Program, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS CONICE, Dept Mother & Child Hlth Res, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Univ Malawi, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Coll Med, Zomba, Malawi
[6] Bayero Univ, Africa Ctr Excellence Populat Hlth & Policy, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
[7] JN Med Coll, KLE Acad Higher Educ & Res, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
[8] Catholic Univ Hlth & Allied Hlth Sci, Archbishop Antony Mayala Sch Nursing, Mwanza, Tanzania
[9] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, Lancs, England
[10] Queen Elizabeth Cent Hosp, Coll Med, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Res Inst, Blantyre, Malawi
[11] Univ Liverpool, Inst Lifecourse & Med Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[12] Fakir Mohan Med Coll & Hosp, Balasore, Odisha, India
[13] Univ Nairobi, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nairobi, Kenya
[14] Queen Elizabeth Cent Hosp, Blantyre, Malawi
[15] Thyolo Dist Hosp, Thyolo, Malawi
[16] Muhammad Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hosp, Kano, Nigeria
[17] WHO, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA,UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programm, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2021年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
childbirth; intrapartum care; labor; partograph; WHO Labour Care Guide;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12511
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction The World Health Organization's (WHO) Labour Care Guide (LCG) is a "next-generation" partograph based on WHO's latest intrapartum care recommendations. It aims to optimize clinical care provided to women and their experience of care. We evaluated the LCG's usability, feasibility, and acceptability among maternity care practitioners in clinical settings. Methods Mixed-methods evaluation with doctors, midwives, and nurses in 12 health facilities across Argentina, India, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Purposively sampled and trained practitioners applied the LCG in low-risk women during labor and rated experiences, satisfaction, and usability. Practitioners were invited to focus group discussions (FGDs) to share experiences and perceptions of the LCG, which were subjected to framework analysis. Results One hundred and thirty-six practitioners applied the LCG in managing labor and birth of 1,226 low-risk women. The majority of women had a spontaneous vaginal birth (91.6%); two cases of intrapartum stillbirths (1.63 per 1000 births) occurred. Practitioner satisfaction with the LCG was high, and median usability score was 67.5%. Practitioners described the LCG as supporting precise and meticulous monitoring during labor, encouraging critical thinking in labor management, and improving the provision of woman-centered care. Conclusions The LCG is feasible and acceptable to use across different clinical settings and can promote woman-centered care, though some design improvements would benefit usability. Implementing the LCG needs to be accompanied by training and supportive supervision, and strategies to promote an enabling environment (including updated policies on supportive care interventions, and ensuring essential equipment is available).
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 75
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
    Millard, Tanya
    Synnot, Anneliese
    Elliott, Julian
    Green, Sally
    McDonald, Steve
    Turner, Tari
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [2] Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
    Tanya Millard
    Anneliese Synnot
    Julian Elliott
    Sally Green
    Steve McDonald
    Tari Turner
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [3] Feasibility and Acceptability of Pediatric Teledentistry: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Alrumaim, Sarah
    Farsi, Nada
    Farsi, Najat
    Baghlaf, Khlood
    Farsi, Deema
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2025,
  • [4] A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies
    Khairat, Saif
    Coleman, Cameron
    Newlin, Thomas
    Rand, Victoria
    Ottmar, Paige
    Bice, Thomas
    Carson, Shannon S.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 94
  • [5] Feasibility, acceptability, and limited efficacy of health system-led familial risk notification: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation
    Blasi, Paula R.
    Scrol, Aaron
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Gray, Marlaine Figueroa
    Tiffany, Brooks
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Ralston, James D.
    Leppig, Kathleen A.
    Henrikson, Nora B.
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [6] Feasibility, acceptability, and limited efficacy of health system-led familial risk notification: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation
    Paula R. Blasi
    Aaron Scrol
    Melissa L. Anderson
    Marlaine Figueroa Gray
    Brooks Tiffany
    Stephanie M. Fullerton
    James D. Ralston
    Kathleen A. Leppig
    Nora B. Henrikson
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 8
  • [7] Evaluation of usability and user feedback to guide telepharmacy application development in Indonesia: a mixed-methods study
    Alfian, Sofa D.
    Sania, Jihan A.
    Aini, Dzulfah Q.
    Khoiry, Qisty A.
    Griselda, Meliana
    Ausi, Yudisia
    Zakiyah, Neily
    Puspitasari, Irma M.
    Suwantika, Auliya A.
    Mahfud, Mariska
    Aji, Saktian
    Abdulah, Rizky
    Kassianos, Angelos P.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [8] The Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC): A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Contextual Appropriateness
    Lyon, Aaron R.
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Ludwig, Kristy
    Stoep, Ann Vander
    Pullmann, Michael D.
    Dorsey, Shannon
    Eaton, John
    Hendrix, Ethan
    McCauley, Elizabeth
    SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 7 (04) : 273 - 286
  • [9] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Mobile Intervention for Methadone Maintenance Clients
    Guarino, Honoria
    Acosta, Michelle
    Marsch, Lisa A.
    Xie, Haiyi
    Aponte-Melendez, Yesenia
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2016, 30 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] The Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC): A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Contextual Appropriateness
    Aaron R. Lyon
    Eric J. Bruns
    Kristy Ludwig
    Ann Vander Stoep
    Michael D. Pullmann
    Shannon Dorsey
    John Eaton
    Ethan Hendrix
    Elizabeth McCauley
    School Mental Health, 2015, 7 : 273 - 286