Student in the shell: The robotic body and student engagement

被引:23
|
作者
Lei, Ming [1 ]
Clemente, Ian M. [1 ]
Hu, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, 620 Farm Lane,Erickson Hall Rm 435, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Robots; Embodiment; Social presence; Student engagement; Synchronous learning; NONVERBAL-COMMUNICATION; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; CLASSROOM; TELEPRESENCE; ACHIEVEMENT; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION; ATTITUDES; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The purpose of this case study was to explore how the embodiment of graduate students in robotic surrogates was related to their engagement in a class with other robotically and non-robotically embodied classmates. Using a mixed methods design, we collected survey and in-class observational data on the students' perceptions of their robotic bodies and their engagement in the course. Applying linear models and thematic analysis, we sought to identify prevailing patterns of students' use their robotic bodies to engage in their learning. Our findings suggest that nonverbal communication with one's robotic body is a dominant form of interaction and engagement in synchronous learning contexts and multiple contextual factors affect robotic students' engagement. Specifically, the capabilities of the robotic surrogate and the student's perceptions of the surrogate as an extension of their own body may influence their engagement in educational contexts. Patterns of robotic and nonverbal behaviors may also vary with instructional context and social learning. For robotically telepresent students, embodiment becomes a central factor to their engagement and should be included in theories of engagement in technology-mediated contexts that involve surrogate bodies.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Genesis of Student Engagement
    Chambers, Gretta
    LEARNING LANDSCAPES, 2007, 1 (01): : 13 - 18
  • [22] Student Engagement Dataset
    Delgado, Kevin
    Origgi, Juan Manuel
    Hasanpoor, Tania
    Yu, Hao
    Allessio, Danielle
    Arroyo, Ivon
    Lee, William
    Betke, Margrit
    Woolf, Beverly
    Bargal, Sarah Adel
    2021 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION WORKSHOPS (ICCVW 2021), 2021, : 3621 - 3629
  • [23] The ABCs of student engagement
    Parsons, Seth A.
    Nuland, Leila Richey
    Parsons, Allison Ward
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2014, 95 (08) : 23 - 27
  • [24] Assessing College Student Engagement: Development and Validation of the Student Course Engagement Scale
    Lin, Shu-Hui
    Huang, Yun-Chen
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 36 (07) : 694 - 708
  • [25] University student’s engagement: development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI)
    João Maroco
    Ana Lúcia Maroco
    Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
    Jennifer A. Fredricks
    Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29
  • [26] University student's engagement: development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI)
    Maroco, Joao
    Maroco, Ana Lucia
    Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana Alvares
    Fredricks, Jennifer A.
    PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2016, 29
  • [27] Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE)
    Dixson, Marcia D.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2015, 19 (04): : 143 - 158
  • [28] Student engagement, school involvement, and transfer student success
    Turnquest, Krysti N.
    Fan, Weihua
    Rangel, Virginia Snodgrass
    Dyer, Nazly
    Master, Allison
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 79
  • [29] Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies
    Bolliger, Doris U.
    Martin, Florence
    DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2018, 39 (04) : 568 - 583
  • [30] International Student Engagement: An Exploration of Student and Faculty Perceptions
    Wang, Rong
    BrckaLorenz, Allison
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS, 2018, 8 (02) : 1002 - 1033