Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images

被引:43
|
作者
Correa, Leticia Ruhland [1 ]
Spin-Neto, Rubens [2 ]
Stavropoulos, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
Schropp, Lars [5 ]
Dias da Silveira, Heloisa Emilia [1 ]
Wenzel, Ann
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Periodontol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] CEPBR, Athens, Greece
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Prosthet Dent, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; digital panoramic radiography; implant planning; implant size; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CONE-BEAM; MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY; ACCURACY; CT; DOSIMETRY; SELECTION; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12126
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo compare the implant size (width and length) planned with digital panoramic radiographs, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic views, or CBCT cross-sectional images, in four implant systems. Material and methodsSeventy-one patients with a total of 103 implant sites in the upper premolar and/or lower molar regions were examined with digital panoramic radiography (D-PAN) and (CBCT). A metal ball 5mm in diameter was placed in the edentulous area for the D-PAN. CBCT data sets were reformatted to a 10-mm thick CBCT panoramic view (CBCT-pan) and 1-mm cross-sections (CBCT-cross). Measurements were performed in the images using dedicated software. All images were displayed on a monitor and assessed by three observers who outlined a dental implant by placing four reference points in the site of the implant-to-be. Differences in width and length of the implant-to-be from the three modalities were analyzed. The implant size selected in the CBCT-cross images was then compared to that selected in the other two modalities (D-PAN and CBCT-pan) for each of the implant systems separately. ResultsThe implant-to-be (average measurements among observers) was narrower when measured in CBCT-cross compared with both D-PAN and CBCT-Pan. For premolar sites, the width also differed significantly between D-PAN and CBCT-pan modalities. The implant-to-be was also significantly shorter when recorded in CBCT-cross than in D-PAN. In premolar sites, there were no significant differences in implant length among the three image modalities. It mattered very little for the change in implant step sizes whether CBCT-cross was compared to D-PAN or CBCT-pan images. ConclusionOur results show that the selected implant size differs when planned on panoramic or cross-section CBCT images. In most cases, implant size measured in cross-section images was narrower and shorter than implant size measured in a panoramic image or CBCT-based panoramic view.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 695
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size
    Schropp, Lars
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Gotfredsen, Erik
    Wenzel, Ann
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (04) : 424 - 429
  • [22] Incidental Findings of Soft Tissue Radiopacities on Digital Panoramic Radiographs: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Preethy, M.
    Elangovan, Somasundaram
    Lakshmi, Suman
    Kumar, Senthil
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE AND RADIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [23] Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone
    Ciftci, Mehmet Ertugrul
    Aktan, Ali Murat
    Isman, Ozlem
    Yildirim, Eren
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2016, 38 (03) : 313 - 320
  • [24] Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone
    Mehmet Ertuğrul Çiftçi
    Ali Murat Aktan
    Özlem İşman
    Eren Yıldırım
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2016, 38 : 313 - 320
  • [25] Digital panoramic radiography and CBCT as auxiliary tools for detection of low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study
    Abdinian, Mehrdad
    Milaei, Mina
    Soltani, Parisa
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [26] Deep Learning Based Detection of Missing Tooth Regions for Dental Implant Planning in Panoramic Radiographic Images
    Park, Jumi
    Lee, Junseok
    Moon, Seongyong
    Lee, Kyoobin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [27] Digital panoramic radiography and CBCT as auxiliary tools for detection of low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study
    Mehrdad Abdinian
    Mina Milaei
    Parisa Soltani
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [28] Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea C.
    Zitzmann, Nicola U.
    Walter, Clemens
    Schulze, Ralf K. W.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (08) : 1010 - 1016
  • [29] Radiographic findings in panoramic radiographs of the elderly: cross-sectional study in 1006 patients
    Macedo da Silva Dias, Ana Carolina
    Costa de Medeiros, Ana Miryam
    Leite de Freitas, Yan Nogueira
    de Lima, Kenio Costa
    Leite Maia, Paulo Raphael
    de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2019, 60 (02): : 59 - 65
  • [30] Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging
    Potter, BJ
    Shrout, MK
    Russell, CM
    Sharawy, M
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1997, 84 (04): : 436 - 442