Mind the gap! On the future of AI research

被引:13
|
作者
Dahlin, Emma [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Themat Studies Technol & Social Change, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Anthropol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
来源
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1057/s41599-021-00750-9
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Research on AI tends to analytically separate technical and social issues, viewing AI first as a technical object that only later, after it has been implemented, may have social consequences. This commentary paper discusses how some of the challenges of AI research relate to the gap between technological and social analyses, and it proposes steps ahead for how to practically achieve prosperous collaborations for future AI research. The discussion draws upon three examples to illustrate the analytical gap in different phases of the development of AI systems. Attending to the planning phase, the first example highlights the risk of oversimplifying the task for an AI system by not incorporating a social analysis at the outset of the development. The second example illuminates the issue of system acceptance, where the paper elaborates on why acceptance is multifaceted and need not be approached as merely a technical problem. With the third example, the paper notes that AI systems may change a practice, suggesting that a continuous analysis of such changes is necessary for projects to maintain relevance as well as to consider the broader impact of the developed technology. The paper argues that systematic and substantial social analyses should be integral to AI development. Exploring the connections between an AI's technical design and its social implications is key to ensuring feasible and sustainable AI systems that benefit society. The paper calls for further multi-disciplinary research initiatives that explore new ways to close the analytical gap between technical and social approaches to AI.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research in science communication in Latin America: mind the gap
    Massarani, Luisa
    Oliveira, Thaiane
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 21 (07):
  • [22] Mind the gap: Research and practice in ergonomics and human factors
    Department of Aviation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    Contemp. Ergonomics Hum. Factors, (63-71):
  • [23] Mind the Gap: Unexpected Pitfalls in Doing Classroom Research
    Baker, Amanda A.
    Lee, Joseph J.
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2011, 16 (05) : 1435 - 1447
  • [24] MIND THE GAP: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS
    Shorrock, S. T.
    Chung, A. Z. Q.
    CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS 2010, 2010, : 63 - 71
  • [25] Reflections on ADMT UK Research Conference: Mind the Gap
    Rosevear, Karen
    Butler, Jacqueline
    BODY MOVEMENT AND DANCE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2007, 2 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [26] Differences in technical and clinical perspectives on AI validation in cancer imaging: mind the gap!
    Chouvarda, Ioanna
    Colantonio, Sara
    Verde, Ana S. C.
    Jimenez-Pastor, Ana
    Cerda-Alberich, Leonor
    Metz, Yannick
    Zacharias, Lithin
    Nabhani-Gebara, Shereen
    Bobowicz, Maciej
    Tsakou, Gianna
    Lekadir, Karim
    Tsiknakis, Manolis
    Marti-Bonmati, Luis
    Papanikolaou, Nikolaos
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [27] Mind the gap and bridge the gap: research excellence and diffusion of academic knowledge in Sweden
    Wigren-Kristoferson, Caroline
    Gabrielsson, Jonas
    Kitagawa, Fumi
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 38 (06) : 481 - 492
  • [28] Mind Matters: How AI is evolving research into Parkinson's
    Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Packing Sourcer, 2022, : 14 - 15
  • [29] Bridging the Gap from AI Ethics Research to Practice
    Baxter, Kathy
    Schlesinger, Yoav
    Aerni, Sarah
    Baker, Lewis
    Dawson, Julie
    Kenthapadi, Krishnaram
    Kloumann, Isabel
    Wallach, Hanna
    FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, : 682 - 682
  • [30] AI in sales: Laying the foundations for future research
    McClure, Colleen E.
    Epler, Rhett T.
    Schmitt, Laurianne
    Rangarajan, Deva
    JOURNAL OF PERSONAL SELLING & SALES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (02) : 108 - 127