Correction of pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh: A clinical series

被引:11
|
作者
Martinello, Ruby [1 ]
Scutiero, Gennaro [1 ]
Stuto, Angelo [2 ]
Indraccolo, Ugo [1 ]
Cracco, Francesco [1 ]
Borghi, Chiara [1 ]
Sorrentino, Felice [3 ]
Nappi, Luigi [3 ]
Greco, Pantaleo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Morphol Surg & Expt Med, Inst Obstet & Gynecol, Ferrara, Italy
[2] Policlin Abano Terme, Operat Unit Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Serv Colon Proctol Surg, Abano Terme, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Inst Obstet & Gynecol, Foggia, Italy
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Laparoscopic lateral suspension; Surgical treatment; Mesh; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OUTCOME REPORT; SACROCOLPOPEXY; SATISFACTION; TERMINOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Illustrating the outcomes of laparoscopic lateral suspension by mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Study design: A retrospective observational study was conducted collecting medical records of 48 patients treated between May 2016 and April 2018 in two different centers in Italy. Pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations as well as patients' satisfaction scores were considered. Patients were followed for two years. Statistical analysis was determined using the chi-square test in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, while Kaplan-Meier curves were built for assessing the prolapse recurrence and the symptoms recurrence. The Steel-Dwass test for pairwise comparisons was used to compare median scores from the King's General Health Perception Questionnaire answers. Results: Regarding the anatomical result, the outcome was either optimal or satisfactory (PoP-Q <= 1) at 12 months in 92% of patients for anterior compartment, in 100% for apical compartment, and in 75% for posterior compartment (intention-to-treat). Kaplan-Meier curves depicted a repair of prolapse in 70% of cases, with better outcomes for the anterior and the apical compartment. Patient self-perception of health was over 80% at each follow-up evaluation. Conclusion: Laparoscopic lateral suspension is a reasonable technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Further studies are needed to prove such a technique versus alternative surgeries. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 356
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Isenlik, Bekir Sitki
    Aksoy, Orhan
    Erol, Onur
    Mulayim, Baris
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (01) : 231 - 238
  • [32] Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Bekir Sıtkı Isenlik
    Orhan Aksoy
    Onur Erol
    Barıs Mulayim
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 231 - 238
  • [33] A New Combined Laparoscopic-Vaginal Lateral Suspension Procedure for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Miele, G. M.
    Marra, P. M.
    Cefali, K.
    Venturella, R.
    Di Carlo, C.
    Zullo, F.
    UROLOGY, 2021, 149 : 263 - 263
  • [34] Laparoscopic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (Pops) Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Treatment of Rectal Prolapse: Prospective Cohort Study
    Farag, Ahmed
    Mashhour, Abdrabou N.
    Raslan, Mohamed
    Tamer, Mohamed
    Elbarmelgi, Mohamed Yehia
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (09) : 3158 - 3166
  • [35] Laparoscopic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (Pops) Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Treatment of Rectal Prolapse: Prospective Cohort Study
    Ahmed Farag
    Abdrabou N. Mashhour
    Mohamed Raslan
    Mohamed Tamer
    Mohamed Yehia Elbarmelgi
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 3158 - 3166
  • [36] Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial for Laparoscopic Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacropexy vs. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension
    niguez-Sevilla, Isabel
    Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria Luisa
    Ruiz-Cotorruelo, Vicente Luis
    Wilczak, Maciej
    Chmaj-Wierzchowska, Karolina
    Solano-Calvo, Juan Antonio
    Perez-Munuzuri, Maria Elena
    Salinas-Pena, Juan Raul
    Arense-Gonzalo, Julian Jesus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (06)
  • [37] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dubuisson Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Short-Term Results
    Malanowska-Jarema, Ewelina
    Starczewski, Andrzej
    Melnyk, Mariia
    Oliveira, Dulce
    Balzarro, Matteo
    Rubillota, Emanuel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [38] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study
    Tagliaferri, Valeria
    Taccaliti, Chiara
    Romano, Federico
    D'Asta, Marco
    Martulli, Bruno
    Gentile, Cosimo
    Legge, Francesco
    Ruggieri, Stefania
    Guido, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (06) : 2075 - 2081
  • [39] Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse
    Zhu, Lan
    Sun, Zhixing
    Yu, Mei
    Li, Bin
    Li, Xiaochuan
    Lang, Jinghe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [40] Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Fixation in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Imanova, S. S.
    Zeynalov, B. M.
    Akyol, C.
    MAJALAH KEDOKTERAN BANDUNG-MKB-BANDUNG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 54 (01): : 1 - 6