Midfacial Changes Through Anterior Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

被引:15
|
作者
Kanzaki, Hiroyuki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Imai, Yoshimichi [4 ]
Nakajo, Tetsu [1 ,3 ]
Daimaruya, Takayoshi [5 ]
Sato, Akimitsu [4 ]
Tachi, Masahiro [4 ]
Nunomura, Youhei [3 ]
Itagaki, Yusuke [3 ]
Nishimura, Kazuaki [1 ]
Kochi, Shoko [3 ,4 ]
Igarashi, Kaoru [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ Hosp, Maxillooral Disorders, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[2] Tsurumi Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Oral Dysfunct Sci, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[5] Tsutsujigaoka Dent Clin, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
Anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis; cleft lip and palate; midfacial; orthognathic treatment; soft tissue; VELOPHARYNGEAL FUNCTION; SEGMENTAL DISTRACTION; ADVANCEMENT; MANAGEMENT; DEFICIENCY; SPEECH; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000003506
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Maxillary hypoplasia is a major issue in cleft lip and palate patients, and predictable surgical maxillary advancement is required. In the present study, the changes and stability of the maxilla and soft tissue profile achieved after the application of anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis (AMDO) using intraoral expander in unilateral cleft lip and palate and isolated cleft palate patients were investigated by comparing to the Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI) and maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) with rigid external distraction (RED) system. Ten patients who underwent orthognathic treatment with AMDO were examined (AMDO group). Changes in the positions of soft and hard tissue landmarks were calculated from the lateral cephalograms taken before the distraction, at the end of the distraction, and 1 year after the surgery. They were compared with the changes in 7 other unilateral cleft lip and palate patients who underwent LFI (LFI group) and 6 others who underwent DO with RED (RED group). The mean maxillary advancement of the AMDO group was similar to that of the RED group, judged by the change of point A. During DO, the AMDO group showed less clockwise rotation of mandible compared to the RED group. The soft tissue advancement of the upper lip and nose in the AMDO group was similar to that in the RED group, which was significantly larger than that in the LFI group. Our results indicate that AMDO can be surgical option to cleft lip and palate patients with less invasive but excellent improvement in both midfacial skeletal and soft tissue similar to DO-RED.
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1062
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study
    Qian, Liwen
    Qian, Yufen
    Chen, Wener
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study
    Liwen Qian
    Yufen Qian
    Wener Chen
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [43] RETRACTED: Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate (Retracted Article)
    Lin, Xi
    Zhou, Nuo
    Huang, Xuanping
    Song, Shaohua
    Li, Hongyi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (05) : E480 - E484
  • [44] The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery
    Chua, Hannah Daile P.
    Ho, Samuel M. Y.
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 114 (05): : S5 - S10
  • [45] Temporomandibular joint dislocation in patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis Three case reports
    Wang, Binqing
    Zhai, Junya
    Zheng, Yilue
    Tong, Haizhou
    Lu, Yang
    Chen, Zhewei
    Yin, Ningbei
    Song, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) : E24012
  • [46] Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review
    Austin, S. L.
    Mattick, C. R.
    Waterhouse, P. J.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (02) : 96 - 108
  • [47] Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate in a Patient With X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia
    Sato, Yutaka
    Mishimagi, Takashi
    Katsuki, Yuko
    Harada, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (07) : 1396.e1 - 1396.e7
  • [48] Minimally-invasive anterior maxillary distraction technique in patients with cleft lip and palate and maxillary deficiency: an evaluation of 106 patients
    Shetty, V
    Khanum, A.
    Yadav, A.
    Sailer, H. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 58 (07): : 777 - 783
  • [49] Skeletal and soft tissue changes and stability in cleft lip and palate patients after distraction osteogenesis using a new intraoral maxillary device
    Ansari, Edward
    Tomat, Catherine
    Kadlub, Natacha
    Diner, Patrick A.
    Bellocq, Thomas
    Vazquez, Marie-Paule
    Picard, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (03) : 323 - 328
  • [50] Long-term follow up of positional changes after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate children
    Kadono, A.
    Leonardo, S. E.
    Sato, Y.
    Iida, J.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CLEFT LIP AND PALATE AND RELATED CRANIOFACIAL ANOMALIES (CLEFT), 2009, : 27 - 30