Evaluating the impact of a digital leadership programme on national digital priorities: a mixed methods study

被引:2
|
作者
Acharya, Amish [1 ]
Black, Ruth Claire [1 ]
Smithies, Alisdair [1 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
Medical education & training; Health informatics; Education & training (see Medical Education & Training); HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to determine the impact of the United Kingdom's National Health Service Digital Academy (NHSDA) Digital Health Leadership course on high-level recommendations in digital preparedness and the development of a proficient leadership to oversee digital transformation, which has been a longstanding priority within the NHS. Design A mixed methods study incorporating an online questionnaire, in-depth interviews and focus groups that were then analysed through a thematic analysis, underpinned by a constructivist approach. Settings An online mixed methods study of a defined cohort of participants who had completed the NHSDA course. Participants 26 participants were recruited to the study, of whom 50% were clinicians, 26.9% in management and 19.2% in data science. All had completed the 2-year NHSDA programme in Digital Health Leadership more than 6 months prior. Results Interviews and focus groups elicited two key areas of impact of the course: loco-regional digitisation and the development of a network of change agents. The dissertation project had direct effects on local digital transformation efforts. Most of these projects focused on clinician (11.7%) or service user (10.3%) engagement, as oppose to de novo digital processes (9.4%). The development of a network of digital leaders has facilitated communication between organisations and improved the efficiency of the national digital infrastructure. Conclusions A bespoke course incorporating a dissertation of practice model for digital health leaders can have broader impact for the attainment of digital priorities. This includes helping trusts to successfully adopt digital solutions, as well as fostering shared organisational learning. These influences, however, are mediated by resource and cultural barriers, which continue to hinder transformation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptions of realism in digital scenarios: A mixed methods descriptive study
    Conlon, Margaret M.
    McIntosh, Gwenne L.
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2020, 46
  • [22] Evaluating transformative health leadership education for Indigenous health: a mixed methods study
    Lu, Michelle
    Moinul, Dina
    Crooks, Rachel
    Kelly-Turner, Kenna
    des Ordons, Amanda Roze
    Keegan, David
    Roach, Pamela
    BMJ LEADER, 2023, 7
  • [23] Evaluating transformative health leadership education for Indigenous health: a mixed methods study
    Lu, Michelle
    Moinul, Dina
    Crooks, Rachel
    Kelly-Turner, Kenna
    des Ordons, Amanda Roze
    Keegan, David
    Roach, Pamela
    BMJ LEADER, 2023, 7
  • [24] Evaluating webinar-based training: a mixed methods study of trainee reactions toward digital web conferencing
    Gegenfurtner, Andreas
    Zitt, Alexander
    Ebner, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 24 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [25] What Faculty and Students Value When Evaluating Human Digital Anatomy Platforms: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Lee, Jason Wen Yau
    Susanto, Johan
    Lai, Siang Hui
    Cheow, Peng Chung
    Low, Li Xiang Tessa
    Bello, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 11
  • [26] Digital methods of impact on the image
    Kseniia, Ezhova
    Anton, Chuhlamov
    DIGITAL OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES 2019, 2019, 11062
  • [27] A Mixed Methods Evaluation Of A LIS Leadership Programme In South Africa
    Hart, Genevieve
    QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES, 2015, : 153 - 163
  • [28] Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
    Hall, Amanda
    Richmond, Helen
    Bursey, Krystal
    Hansen, Zara
    Williamson, Esther
    Copsey, Bethan
    Albury, Charlotte
    Asghari, Shabnam
    Curran, Vernon
    Pike, Andrea
    Etchegary, Holly
    Lamb, Sarah
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [29] Evaluating a midwifery leadership programme: a process evaluation study
    Bogren, Malin
    Jha, Paridhi
    Sharma, Bharati
    Erlandsson, Kerstin
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2025, 38 (01)
  • [30] The Impact of Intervention Design on User Engagement in Digital Therapeutics Research: Factorial Experiment With a Mixed Methods Study
    Lee, Hyerim
    Choi, Eung Ho
    Shin, Jung U.
    Kim, Tae-Gyun
    Oh, Jooyoung
    Shin, Bokyoung
    Sim, Jung Yeon
    Shin, Jaeyong
    Kim, Meelim
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8